Recent DeSci (Decentralized Science) conferences continue to draw significant attention, with industry leaders gathering to discuss a core question: how will the future of scientific research evolve?
The discussions in this field are indeed worth paying attention to. Conference venues have brought together numerous industry leaders and researchers who are exchanging different ideas and seeking answers to how blockchain technology can empower fundamental scientific research.
The Happy-Sci project launched by YZiLabs is a typical representative of this wave. It attempts to reorganize the flow and incentive mechanisms of scientific research resources within a decentralized framework. What's interesting about this direction is that it breaks the centralized distribution model of traditional research funding, giving more innovative ideas the opportunity to secure financial support.
Of course, we also need to be honest—for DeSci to truly land in practice, from theoretical research to applied innovation, it still requires more time and practical testing. Project teams need to prove that their models not only work conceptually but can also stimulate genuine scientific innovation in actual operations.
How do you view the DeSci track? Which directions do you think have the most potential?
Recent DeSci (Decentralized Science) conferences continue to draw significant attention, with industry leaders gathering to discuss a core question: how will the future of scientific research evolve?
The discussions in this field are indeed worth paying attention to. Conference venues have brought together numerous industry leaders and researchers who are exchanging different ideas and seeking answers to how blockchain technology can empower fundamental scientific research.
The Happy-Sci project launched by YZiLabs is a typical representative of this wave. It attempts to reorganize the flow and incentive mechanisms of scientific research resources within a decentralized framework. What's interesting about this direction is that it breaks the centralized distribution model of traditional research funding, giving more innovative ideas the opportunity to secure financial support.
Of course, we also need to be honest—for DeSci to truly land in practice, from theoretical research to applied innovation, it still requires more time and practical testing. Project teams need to prove that their models not only work conceptually but can also stimulate genuine scientific innovation in actual operations.
How do you view the DeSci track? Which directions do you think have the most potential?