Tom Lee 复活了对比特币和以太坊价格的虚假预测，并将其视为事实。社区指出其不准确性，但这一说法仍然存在，影响着交易策略，尤其是与加密资产相关的股票。

原文标题：How Banks Learned To Stop Worrying And Love Stablecoins 原文作者：Christian Catalini，Forbes 编译：Peggy，BlockBeats 编者按：稳定币是否会冲击银行体系，曾是过去几年最核心的争论之一。但随着数据、研究与监管框架逐渐清晰，答案正在变得更冷静：稳定币并未引发大规模存款外流，反而在现实的「存款黏性」约束下，成为倒逼银行提升利率与效率的竞争力量。 本文从银行视角出发，重新理解稳定币。它未必是威胁，更可能是一场迫使金融体系自我更新的催化剂。 以下为原文： 1983 年，一台

[SLP]() [区块链游戏]() [GameFi]() 在瞬息万变的加密货币市场中，2025年SLP币投资前景成为投资者热议的话题。SLP币未来发展是否能超越过去的辉煌，引领市场新趋势？透过全面的SLP币市场分析，我们不仅关注其独特价值，更探讨SLP币价格预测的实际影响及投资风险。探索SLP币的未来，或许能为投资者揭示新的机会。 Smooth Love Potion (SLP)作为区块链游戏生态的重要代币，在2025年市场表现引人瞩目。目前SLP币总市值已达$38,047,364.63，流通供应量为36,115,763,931枚，在全球加密货币市场中排名第564位。SLP币投资前景受到越来

[AXS]() [GameFi]() [投资策略]() 流动性挖矿策略在加密货币投资界引发了极大的兴趣。尤其是AXSSLP币收益分析显示，此策略提供独特机遇。进入Axie Infinity流动性池，了解DeFi收益优化方法，并发掘GameFi流动性提供者的潜力。有机会掌握加密游戏代币投资的双重收益，这篇文章将揭示如何在2025年利用流动性挖矿策略最大化收益，并有效管理风险。 在2025年的GameFi领域，AXSSLP币流动性挖矿策略已成为许多投资者关注的焦点。AXSSLP代表Axie Infinity Shards(AXS)和Smooth Love Potion(SLP)这两种代币组合而成

火星财经消息，据 Lookonchain 监测，曾获利超过 3600 万美元的 PEPE 巨鲸 “This Will Make You Love Again” 持续买入 ASTER。自此以来，他已以平均 0.97 美元的价格买入 841 万枚 ASTER（价值 814 万美元），现浮盈 110 万美元。

Token of Love音乐节通过Web3技术提升传统音乐节体验，采用区块链确保票务安全，NFT门票提供收藏价值与特殊权益，促进观众互动与参与，创造沉浸式艺术体验，实现社区共创，增强粉丝归属感。

Token of Love音乐节将于2025年10月在新加坡举行，融合区块链技术与音乐，为观众提供独特体验。NFT门票系统颠覆传统购票模式，提升粉丝互动与收藏价值。区块链技术深化了艺人与粉丝关系，展现了文化创意的潜力。同时，Gate引入加密货币支付，简化跨境交易，促进国际参与，标志着区块链在文化活动中的重要应用。

Gate VIP 理财夏日狂欢第四期盛大开跑！VIP 用户完成报名并达成指定条件，即可获得高达 50 克 AU9999 黄金奖励，并参与 Token of Love 音乐节门票抽奖。

Gate 余币宝 VIP 夏末狂欢开启，净充值与新增持仓解锁 AU9999 黄金奖励，最高 50g，还有机会抽中 Token of Love 音乐节门票。

Token of Love音乐节将于2025年2月在香港举行，结合Web3技术与先锋音乐，为5000名观众提供独特体验。采用NFT门票和加密货币支付，音乐节实现去中心化治理，增强参与感。首次参与者需提前了解相关知识和保护资产安全。

揭秘Token of Love：区块链赋能的音乐盛宴体验 Token of Love音乐节作为一场融合区块链技术与音乐艺术的盛宴，为参与者带来了前所未有的沉浸式体验。这场区块链音乐节体验不仅仅是一场音乐盛会，更是[Web3]()技术与主流文化的完美结合。通过智能合约和分布式账本技术，Token of Love实现了票务管理的透明化和去中心化，有效降低了黄牛票和假票问题。参与者可以使用加密货币支付音乐节门票，享受更加便捷和安全的交易体验。此外，区块链技术还为音乐节提供了实时互动和参与机制，让粉丝与艺术家之间的互动更加紧密和直接。 数字身份与NFT：音乐节收藏家的新宠 在Token of

据官方消息，由 Gate 冠名赞助、Decrypt 呈现的 Token of Love 音乐节将于 2025 年 10 月 1 日登陆新加坡，打造融合 Web3 与主流文化的年度盛事。 本届音乐节的焦点之一，是韩国流行音乐代表人物 HyunA（泫雅） 确认将亲临现场演出。HyunA（泫雅） 因参与全球热曲《江南 Style》而享誉国际，并以其独特舞台表现和多首热门单曲在亚洲及全球拥有庞大粉丝群。本届音乐节阵容还包括凭借《Fast》、《Paralyzed》在 TikTok 走红的美国说唱歌手 SUECO、人气摇滚乐队 CLICK15，携手中国首位入选 DJ Mag Top 100 的

Kumiko Love，社交媒体上被称为预算妈妈，最近分享了一段名为“我不会上当的宣传”的Instagram短视频。这段短视频播放了埃尔顿·约翰的《火箭人》，并展示了爱不认可的信念。 查看：你已经‘成功’的3个标志

火星财经消息, 据官方消息，4 月 15 日，AI 驱动小游戏 Love Terminal（爱之终端）已正式上线 Kaia Chain 以及亚洲热门社交平台 LINE 生态，该应用通过 Web3 AI App 创作平台

2025年2月19日，由全球顶尖加密货币交易所Gate.io独家冠名呈现的Token of Love音乐节在香港成功举办，圆满落幕。本次活动由Puffverse（Layer 3 AIGC云游戏平台，同时也拥有多款自主研发的游戏链接Web 2和Web 3用户)，Alibaba Cloud，SoSoValue，Metaverse HQ，LTP，Bedrock和Memeland等赞助商提供支持。 作为Consensus HK大会规模最大的官方特别活动，本次音乐节不仅是一场音乐与Web3的跨界狂欢，吸引了上千名观众和数十家媒体与品牌方共同见证这一时刻，更是一场聚集了众多行业领导者与投资者的高端社

Aria宣布将代币化BTS与Steve Aoki合作单曲《The Truth Untold》部分版权，引入RWA IP领域。Aria Premiere Launch已筹集1,093万美元，音乐目录包含全球顶级艺人作品，预计7%年化版税。《The Truth Untold》收录于BTS专辑《Love Yourself: Tear》，在各平台播放量超过6.7亿次。

Token of Love 香港音乐节官宣，由 Gate.io 冠名呈现，将于2025年2月19日开启，陈冠希领衔组合 3CORNERZ 将为观众带来多元融合风格的音乐演出，预计将吸引5000名观众及全球顶级DJ、知名乐队及国际音乐团体参与。活动为专属邀请制，全平台用户可申请门票。

Gate 冠名呈现的 Token of Love 香港音乐节将于 2025 年 2 月 19 日举办，与全球领先的加密与区块链技术大会 Consensus 大会合作，吸引全球顶级 DJ 和国际音乐团体参与，预计将吸引 5,000 名观众。此次活动旨在推动加密文化的影响力和跨行业的对话与合作。

* * * * * If the SEC were a sports team measured by its “win” rate, it would be a runaway champ. But that win-loss record suffered a mild hit — and its first ever loss in an “ICO” case — one that refers to the controversial method of crowd fundraising and that borrows from the public company “IPO” or initial public offering. A federal judge denied the SEC a preliminary injunction against Blockvest after he granted a temporary restraining order on the same issue. We chat with Amit Singh, attorney and shareholder in Stradling’s corporate and securities practice group about the SEC’s fresh loss. His take? They’ll be out for blood, next. **For those not in the know, share the legal background leading up to this case.** In October of this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed a complaint against Blockvest LLC and its founder, Reginald Buddy Ringgold III. According to the complaint, Blockvest falsely claimed its planned December initial coin offering was “registered” and “approved” by the SEC and created a fake regulatory agency, the Blockchain Exchange Commission, which included a phony logo that was nearly identical to that of the SEC. The SEC also alleged Blockvest conducted pre-sales of its digital token, BLV, ahead of the ICO and raised more than $2.5 million. The SEC’s complaint alleged violations of the anti-fraud provisions of the Securities Exchange and the Securities Act and violations of the Securities Act’s prohibitions against the offer and sale of unregistered securities in the absence of an exemption from the registration requirements. U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel issued a temporary restraining order “freezing assets, prohibiting the destruction of documents, granting expedited discovery, requiring accounting and order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not be granted” on October 5, 2018. On Tuesday, November 27, in the SEC’s first loss in stopping an ICO, judge Gonzalo Curiel stated that the SEC had not shown at this stage of the case that the BLV tokens were securities under the Howey Test, a decades-old test established by the U.S. Supreme Court for determining whether certain transactions are investment contracts and thus securities. If the tokens weren’t securities, all the SEC’s other allegations automatically fail Under the Howey Test, a transaction is an investment contract (or security) if: – It is an investment of money; – There is an expectation of profits from the investment; – The investment of money is in a common enterprise; and – Any profit comes from the efforts of a promoter or third party Later cases have expanded the term “money” in the Howey Test to include investment assets other than money. The judge said that the SEC failed to show investors had an expectation of profits. “While defendants claim that they had an expectation in Blockvest’s future business, no evidence is provided to support the test investors’ expectation of profits,” the judge wrote. Blockvest argued that the pre-ICO money came from 32 “test investors” and said the BLV tokens were only designed for testing its platform. It presented statements from several investors who said they either did not buy BLV tokens or rely on any representations that the SEC has alleged are false. The SEC responded by noting that various individuals wrote “Blockvest” or “coins” on their checks and were provided with a Blockvest ICO white paper describing the project and the terms of the ICO. Judge Curiel said that evidence, by itself, wasn’t enough: “Merely writing ‘Blockvest or coins’ on their checks is not sufficient to demonstrate what promotional materials or economic inducements these purchasers were presented with prior to their investments. Accordingly, plaintiff has not demonstrated that ‘securities’ were sold to [these] individuals.” **Won’t the case proceed? Why is the denial of an injunction important here?** This does not mean that the SEC cannot pursue an action against the defendants Rather it just means that the SEC didn’t meet the high burden required to receive a preliminary injunction of proving “(1) a prima facie case of previous violations of federal securities laws, and (2) a reasonable likelihood that the wrong will be repeated.” The court determined that, at this stage, without full discovery and disputed issues of material facts, the Court could not decide whether the BLV token were securities. Since the SEC didn’t meet its burden of proving the tokens were securities in the first place, it couldn’t have shown that there was a previous violation of the federal securities laws So, the first prong was not met Further, the defendants agreed to stop the ICO and provide 30 days’ prior notice to the SEC if they intend to move forward with the ICO So, the court determined that there was not a reasonable likelihood that the wrong will be repeated As a result, the SEC’s motion for a preliminary injunction was denied. Nonetheless, this is an important case as it is the first time the SEC went after an ICO issuer and the issuer pushed back and won (if only temporarily) It reminds us that, though most people think of the SEC as judge and jury in securities actions, that isn’t the case Ultimately, an issuer that pushes back may have a chance if it has the wherewithal to fight and if it has good arguments However, this does not mean that the SEC is done with them and we may very well see this case continue. **Won’t media coverage of this case ultimately impair Blockvest’s ability to raise funds — its ultimate goal?** That may very well be the case. Unfortunately, unsophisticated investors could ultimately merely remember the Blockvest name and decide that it must be a good investment since they’ve heard of it (ala PT Barnum – “I don’t care what the newspapers say about me as long as they spell my name right.”). But I may be too cynical (hopefully I am). In any case, I would be surprised if Blockvest attempts to pursue an ICO without either registering the tokens or utilizing an exemption from the registration requirements. They clearly have a target on their back, so the SEC would love another crack at them I’m sure. Plus, even though a preliminary injunction was denied here, the SEC still got what it wanted as Blockvest agreed not to pursue the ICO without giving the SEC 30 days’ prior notice of its intent to do so. So, the investing public was ultimately protected. **What is the SEC’s current stance on what constitutes a security based on this case?** The SEC will still point to the Howey Test Further, as stated in recent speeches by Hinman and others, the SEC seems to be focused not only on the utility of any tokens (i.e., they can be used on the platform for which they were created), but also on decentralization (that the efforts of the promoters are no longer required to maintain the value/utility of the tokens/platform). However, the court in this case looked at the investment of money prong differently than has historically been the case Normally, the investment of money prong is assumed with little analysis as any consideration is considered “money” for purposes of the test But this case looked at the investment not from the purchaser’s subjective intent when committing funds, but instead based the analysis on what was offered to prospective purchasers and what information they relied on So, issuers are well advised to be very careful in how they advertise an offering. Further, the expectation of profits prong wasn’t met because, according to Blockvest, these were just test investors So, it wasn’t clear these folks invested for a profit The tokens were never even used or sold outside the platform. **Where does the Ninth Circuit sit in regards to what is a security?** The Ninth Circuit follows the Howey Test. However, the common enterprise element has received extensive and varied analysis in the federal circuit courts For example, while all circuits accept “horizontal” commonality as satisfying the common enterprise prong of the Howey Test, a minority of circuits (including the ninth) also accept “vertical” commonality in this analysis. Horizontal commonality involves the pooling of assets, profits and risks in a unitary enterprise, while vertical commonality requires that profits of investors be “interwoven with and dependent upon the efforts and success of those seeking the investment or of third parties” (narrow verticality), or “that the well-being of all investors be dependent upon the promoter’s expertise” (broad commonality). SEC v. SG Ltd., 265 F.3d 42, 49 (1st Cir. 2001). The Ninth Circuit is the only one to accept the narrow vertical approach (though it also accepts horizontal commonality), which finds a common enterprise if there is a correlation between the fortunes of an investor and a promoter.” Sec. & Exch. Comm’n v. Eurobond Exchange, Ltd., 13 F.3d 1334, 1339 (9th Cir., 1994). Under this approach a common enterprise is a venture “in which the ‘fortunes of the investor are interwoven with and dependent upon the efforts and success of those seeking the investment….'” Investors’ funds need not be pooled; rather the fortunes of the investors must be linked with those of the promoters, which suffices to establish vertical commonality. So, a common enterprise exists if a direct correlation has been established between success or failure of the promoter’s efforts and success or failure of the investment. **Which Federal Circuits might offer an equal or even bigger split with the SEC?** I wouldn’t really say that any courts split with the SEC as the SEC’s decisions take precedent over any decisions of those courts. However, there is a split among the circuits as described above with respect to what type of commonality is sufficient to find a common enterprise. **What impact could the outcome of this case have on ICOs at large?** This case may embolden companies who have already conducted ICOs to push back on any SEC actions that they might not otherwise fight as it shows that the SEC will always have to meet the burden of proving all factors of the Howey Test are met before the SEC has jurisdiction over the offering in the first place. **Has the Supreme Court addressed anything crypto, crypto related, or analogous?** The only case I know of where the Supreme court has addressed crypto currencies is Wisconsin Central Ltd. v. United States. That was a case about whether stock counts as “money remuneration” The dissent in that case talked about how our concept of money has changed over time and said that perhaps “one day employees will be paid in bitcoin or some other type of cryptocurrency.” This goes against the IRS’s position that cryptocurrencies are property and should be taxed as such But, it was just a passing comment in the dissent. So, it has no precedential value. But, it may embolden someone to fight the IRS’s position.

微软创办人 Bill Gates 每年都会在夏季以及冬季分享五本书单，用书本填补漫长的寒冬。Bill Gates 表示这次推荐的书主要是关于理解周围的世界，他表示这并不是有意为之的主题。但是在快速变化的时期，就像我们现在所经历的那样，尝试思考事物是很自然的。所以他对于这几本书刚好都与这个主题有关，并不感到惊讶。 比尔盖兹的五本冬季书单 Bill Gates 在自己的部落格上推荐了五本书： 《An Unfinished Love Story》，译作《未完的爱情故事》作者是 Doris Kearns Goodwin. 《The Anxious

Rui Huang的星基地2050在Sotheby's数字艺术日拍卖会上以80万美元的价格售出，吸引了来自全球加密爱好者和艺术收藏家的关注。这部未来主义的地球太空港动画展示了黄锐融艺术与倡导的前瞻性才华。

深潮 TechFlow 消息，11 月 24 日，马斯克在 X 平台发布“WOULD”Meme 图片并表示喜欢，“I love this meme”。受此消息影响，创建于 123 天前的同名代币短时暴涨超 700 倍，市值暂报 600 万美元。 注意：Meme

Delysium透过其创新的AI技术在加密货币领域取得了显着的成就，尤其是在韩国市场表现突出，文中分析了Delysium如何结合AI和社群力量，以及其全球扩散策略，包括在多个主流交易所上市和参与国际活动，Delysium 的产品 Lucy 和 You Know I Love You (YKILY) Network 展示了其在 AI 上的力量技术和对生态系统建设的承诺。

在投资 LOVE 等 Meme 代币时风险是不可忽视的。