From the perspective of the token issuance mechanism, this model indeed has its feasibility. However, some on-chain token issuance platforms have different approaches—they focus more on trading volume and daily average ticker deployment numbers, pursuing scale rather than quality. While this strategy can boost platform popularity, in terms of long-term ecological health, it may not be the optimal choice.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Ramen_Until_Rich
· 2025-12-20 17:23
Quality and scale are always a deadlock; those who choose scale ultimately die because of their own popularity.
View OriginalReply0
FarmHopper
· 2025-12-18 02:08
The approach of piling up scale may be appealing in the short term, but the ecosystem will inevitably collapse sooner or later.
View OriginalReply0
wagmi_eventually
· 2025-12-17 17:53
Basically, it's a game of numbers—short-term satisfaction, long-term pitfalls.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-1a2ed0b9
· 2025-12-17 17:50
Pursuing scale? That's just drinking poison to quench thirst. You're bound to crash eventually.
View OriginalReply0
NeverPresent
· 2025-12-17 17:42
Quality vs. scale—everyone's looking for shortcuts now. As long as it can heat up in the short term, that's enough.
From the perspective of the token issuance mechanism, this model indeed has its feasibility. However, some on-chain token issuance platforms have different approaches—they focus more on trading volume and daily average ticker deployment numbers, pursuing scale rather than quality. While this strategy can boost platform popularity, in terms of long-term ecological health, it may not be the optimal choice.