2025-12-17 18:28:07

The real bottleneck faced by privacy coins is often not in the technology itself, but in ecosystem isolation. When a privacy asset can only operate on a single public chain, its application scenarios become severely limited. Liquidity becomes fragmented, users gradually leave, and it ultimately becomes a niche tool — this is a common pain point for many privacy projects.

Cross-chain integration is the key to breaking the deadlock. The integration of Beldex and Stargate is a good example. By expanding the usability of privacy assets through cross-chain bridging, it allows them to reach more mainstream DeFi ecosystems. This not only enhances liquidity but, more importantly, significantly increases the compatibility between privacy and applications. In other words, privacy assets can only truly integrate into the Web3 ecosystem when they are fluid and actively used.

BDX0,62%

STG4,04%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CompoundPersonality

· 2025-12-20 18:17

That's right, the issue with privacy coins is the fragmented ecosystem. No matter how advanced the technology is, it's useless. I've seen too many projects die because of dispersed liquidity. The integration of Beldex with Stargate is indeed interesting, but it still depends on whether it can truly attract mainstream users in the future. For now, it's still too niche.

View OriginalReply0

ApeWithNoChain

· 2025-12-19 02:49

That's right, privacy coins are just trapped by themselves, the ecosystem is too fragmented. *** Liquidity dispersal is the real dead end; no matter how advanced the technology is, it can't be sold. *** Beldex's approach indeed solves some problems, but it's still far from enough. *** Cross-chain isn't a silver bullet; the fundamental reason for ecosystem isolation is that no one uses it. *** Privacy assets ultimately become collectibles— isn't that sad? *** Wait, can Stargate really save these outdated privacy coins? *** Stop talking nonsense; the real issue is that people don't need so many privacy coins. *** Integration? Maybe they've already been marginalized. *** Liquidity dispersion sounds like a technical issue, but actually, there's no market. *** Cross-chain integration sounds good, but what does it have to do with the future of Monero?

View OriginalReply0

HodlTheDoor

· 2025-12-18 11:26

That's right, privacy coins are indeed stuck due to ecosystem fragmentation. No matter how good the technology is, it's useless. Cross-chain is a viable approach, but it seems that cases like Beldex are still too few. The market needs more of these integrations.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationSurvivor

· 2025-12-18 02:08

To be honest, privacy coins should have figured this out a long time ago. Sticking to just one chain is just waiting to die. Cross-chain is indeed the way out, but the problem is that most projects are moving too slowly, and liquidity has already dispersed. The Beldex case is okay, but the real test is how to maintain the hype afterward.

View OriginalReply0

ChainWallflower

· 2025-12-17 18:57

That's a valid point. Lack of liquidity is indeed a major issue for privacy coins, and a single-chain ecosystem is definitely a dead end. Cross-chain technology can indeed be a lifesaver, but it depends on whether the project team is willing to put in the effort. Beldex's recent moves are okay; at least they didn't end in a dead end. It all depends on how much resources can be invested moving forward. For privacy assets to truly break into the mainstream, ecosystem support is essential; technology alone isn't enough. Ultimately, it's all about liquidity—without trading volume, everything is just virtual.

View OriginalReply0

ClassicDumpster

· 2025-12-17 18:51

Well said. Privacy coins have always had this problem: they build their own ecosystems, users leave very quickly, liquidity becomes dangerously thin, and in the end, they turn into worthless coins. It's hilarious. Cross-chain development definitely needs to be prioritized. I think Beldex's combination approach looks decent, but the key is whether there are real application scenarios in the future. Otherwise, cross-chain efforts will be pointless. Combining privacy and DeFi is easier to talk about than to actually do... Wait, if liquidity is increased but privacy gets cracked, what then? That's a point I've always been unable to understand. That being said, as the old saying goes, a coin without users is a dead end no matter how much you optimize it.

View OriginalReply0

rugpull_ptsd

· 2025-12-17 18:50

That's right, privacy coins are doomed due to ecosystem fragmentation. Cross-chain technology is indeed a lifeline; otherwise, it would truly become a niche hobby. Beldex's move is quite good, but it's uncertain how long it can last.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiLeftOnRead

· 2025-12-17 18:43

That's right, privacy coins really have this problem. What's the use of just hiding on their own chain? Cross-chain is the way to go, otherwise they'll be淘汰ed in the corners. Beldex's recent move is somewhat understanding, at least they know to come out and let some air in. Liquidity that doesn't flow is dead; this principle couldn't be simpler.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityHunter

· 2025-12-17 18:32

At 3 a.m., they are again targeting the liquidity gap... To be honest, Beldex's cross-chain integration data isn't solid enough yet; we need to see how much trading pair depth can be achieved within 24 hours after Stargate bridging.

View OriginalReply0