Getting along with people at different stages and backgrounds is a quick way to accumulate knowledge. There is something to learn from the elderly, the young, and outstanding individuals in various fields. The more diverse your interactions, the sharper your judgment becomes.
Here's an interesting perspective: viewing interpersonal relationships through the lens of project evaluation logic. A person's family of origin is like the foundational code of a project, determining the core architecture and operational mode. Team background checks are necessary; similarly, understanding a person's growth environment and family relationships can reveal many underlying social dynamics.
After observing many projects, you can identify which are truly innovative and which are just well-packaged stories. The same principle applies: frequent social interactions make you more敏锐 at recognizing sincerity and hypocrisy. Using this calm, systematic approach to life choices is much more reliable than blind emotional impulses.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
hodl_therapist
· 2025-12-21 01:29
Wow, this perspective is amazing. Life can also be code auditing.
View OriginalReply0
FUD_Whisperer
· 2025-12-20 08:07
This logic is extremely valuable in crypto; the ability to read people is a survival skill.
If the project team background is not solid, no matter how fancy the whitepaper is, it's still a paper tiger, and it will rug pull just the same.
I feel like this guy is advising us to network with different contacts, but honestly, the most valuable thing in the crypto world is always the judgment of those key figures.
Really, after seeing so many project teams and operations, I now discount anyone's promises. Living like this is exhausting but safe.
I agree on the point of diversified cognition, but I feel the author hasn't experienced the deep disillusionment of heavy rug pulls, which makes the disappointment even more profound.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropFreedom
· 2025-12-18 12:28
Exactly right, I've been using this logic for a while.
Hmm, this approach has some substance; the set of project due diligence can indeed be used to scrutinize individuals.
Social interaction is just continuous scanning; fake ones are easily spotted.
It sounds plausible, but ultimately, feelings are a gamble.
Cognitive accumulation truly depends on gathering people, no doubt.
Getting along with people at different stages and backgrounds is a quick way to accumulate knowledge. There is something to learn from the elderly, the young, and outstanding individuals in various fields. The more diverse your interactions, the sharper your judgment becomes.
Here's an interesting perspective: viewing interpersonal relationships through the lens of project evaluation logic. A person's family of origin is like the foundational code of a project, determining the core architecture and operational mode. Team background checks are necessary; similarly, understanding a person's growth environment and family relationships can reveal many underlying social dynamics.
After observing many projects, you can identify which are truly innovative and which are just well-packaged stories. The same principle applies: frequent social interactions make you more敏锐 at recognizing sincerity and hypocrisy. Using this calm, systematic approach to life choices is much more reliable than blind emotional impulses.