How can a project manage its visibility on major data platforms without triggering negative community reaction? Delisting or filtering from aggregators requires careful communication—is it worth the trade-off?

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MEVSandwichVictimvip
· 20h ago
Listing and delisting are all about mysticism; the key is how to communicate with the community. You really can't afford to offend them.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotStrikervip
· 01-05 13:19
Removing data platforms just to avoid? I find this move questionable; the community isn't stupid.
View OriginalReply0
ProtocolRebelvip
· 01-03 02:50
Listing coins offends retail investors, not listing coins offends institutions, how come both trades end up losing...
View OriginalReply0
OfflineNewbievip
· 01-03 02:42
Damn, coming with this again? Being stealthier makes you even more suspicious.
View OriginalReply0
MemeEchoervip
· 01-03 02:37
Still pretending not to see after selling? That move is a bit fake.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureVerifiervip
· 01-03 02:29
ngl, the real question nobody's asking: if you need to hide from aggregators to avoid backlash, maybe the underlying metrics weren't worth defending in the first place. just saying.
Reply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)