The valuation logic of this token is indeed worth questioning. Comparing it to similar projects, a collectible token like HAPPY-SCI reaching this height seems somewhat mismatched.
What's more interesting is that by opening a certain block explorer and scrolling to the bottom of the page, you can see—officially, there is a blatant donation entry. The key question is: before the token was launched, how much did the official team receive in donations? And where did this amount go now?
Such information should be transparent and straightforward, but it is often these details that best reveal the true operational state of a project. The community should scrutinize these public data more carefully.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FloorPriceNightmare
· 19h ago
The fact that the donation destination is unknown is really frustrating; I just enjoy watching project teams engage in such blatant operations.
View OriginalReply0
MagicBean
· 19h ago
The donation allocation really needs to be looked into thoroughly; otherwise, something just doesn't feel right everywhere.
View OriginalReply0
ServantOfSatoshi
· 19h ago
The donation portal is hanging there, but the accounts are blurry... This is just outrageous.
---
Basically, it's just to see who dares to ask those inappropriate questions.
---
HAPPY-SCI can be pumped so high, I really respect it. What kind of logic is that?
---
With such poor transparency from the official side, no wonder public trust has dissipated.
---
Does anyone still believe in this kind of project... Wake up, everyone.
---
The key issue is where the money went. Such a simple matter, yet they insist on hiding it.
---
I just want to know how many zeros that donation now has.
---
This is a classic sign of a rug pull, all the details are exposed.
---
How was the valuation calculated? By guesswork?
---
Another pump-and-dump supported by a story, speechless.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMisery
· 19h ago
The destination of donations remains a mystery, which is outrageous. Transparency definitely needs to be closely monitored.
The valuation logic of this token is indeed worth questioning. Comparing it to similar projects, a collectible token like HAPPY-SCI reaching this height seems somewhat mismatched.
What's more interesting is that by opening a certain block explorer and scrolling to the bottom of the page, you can see—officially, there is a blatant donation entry. The key question is: before the token was launched, how much did the official team receive in donations? And where did this amount go now?
Such information should be transparent and straightforward, but it is often these details that best reveal the true operational state of a project. The community should scrutinize these public data more carefully.