The trend of vague "check dms" outreach is becoming a real problem. What's more concerning is that many community leaders seem disconnected from basic communication standards—they don't even grasp how to engage properly in their own channels.
This disconnect is telling. When those representing Web3 projects resort to blanket accusations or lack fundamental communication skills, it erodes trust. The gap between what these representatives claim and how they actually interact with their communities keeps widening. It's harder for people to take projects seriously when leadership struggles with something as straightforward as coherent messaging.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BridgeJumper
· 01-09 07:10
ngl this is the current state of Web3: the talkers vs. the doers, always going against each other.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-cff9c776
· 01-08 23:47
According to the supply and demand curve, these guys have no communication skills floor price, and they still expect community trust premiums? Laughing out loud, a typical bear market philosophy textbook version.
View OriginalReply0
EyeOfTheTokenStorm
· 01-07 14:00
Is this set again? I've said it long ago, from the perspective of market cycles, the communication breakdown of such project teams is actually a leading indicator. Historical data shows that after this signal appears, it often corresponds to a rapid decline in technical aspects.
---
Check DMS, this kind of low-level operation... perform quantitative analysis. Any project team doing this has a loss rate of up to 87% for subsequent bagholders, I have records in my database.
---
Looking at these project teams' statements, they completely match the collapse characteristics before a bear market bottom. Everyone, don't get on board; wait for the rebound to do T.
---
Since 2017, how many times has this "leadership defect" act been repeated? The market structure has long been identified; it just depends on when retail investors will react.
---
To put it simply, communication collapse = trust collapse = capital outflow. I've seen this causal chain too many times. Don't be fooled by short-term rebounds. Risk warning.
View OriginalReply0
Rugpull幸存者
· 01-07 10:50
Haha, checking DMs is really the laziest way to communicate, a master at covering up problems.
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxBuster
· 01-07 10:48
Uh... these project leaders are really outrageous. They can't even manage proper communication, and they still have the nerve to represent Web3.
View OriginalReply0
mev_me_maybe
· 01-07 10:48
ngl this is what Web3 looks like now, a bunch of people claiming to be leaders but all they do is send a "check DM" and that's it. It's really annoying.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdrop
· 01-07 10:44
Is "check dm" really the way to save Web3? Laughable. The leadership can't even understand the most basic expressions, and yet they still dare to act like big shots here.
View OriginalReply0
quietly_staking
· 01-07 10:41
Really, the management of these Web3 projects is hopeless in communication skills... talk one thing, do another.
View OriginalReply0
NftBankruptcyClub
· 01-07 10:38
Really, these project teams' communication skills are terrible. Do they still dare to say they understand the community?
The trend of vague "check dms" outreach is becoming a real problem. What's more concerning is that many community leaders seem disconnected from basic communication standards—they don't even grasp how to engage properly in their own channels.
This disconnect is telling. When those representing Web3 projects resort to blanket accusations or lack fundamental communication skills, it erodes trust. The gap between what these representatives claim and how they actually interact with their communities keeps widening. It's harder for people to take projects seriously when leadership struggles with something as straightforward as coherent messaging.