Lately I've been thinking—are we just cruising through the week or putting in the real work? For me, it's always been about that consistent grind. I'm focused on building in the AI space, especially exploring how intelligent systems fit into decentralized ecosystems. Here's what got me thinking though: we usually treat robots and AI as either tools in our toolkit or potentially future citizens with rights. But what if that's not quite right? What if they're actually participants in the system? That changes everything. Participants aren't just passive instruments—they need their own identity to be recognized, they require trust mechanisms to operate, they need clear limits and boundaries. It's a totally different framework for how we think about autonomous agents in Web3.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TokenStormvip
· 01-07 10:43
On-chain data shows that treating AI as a participant rather than a tool indeed changes the game rules. But bro, how do you calculate the costs of identity verification, trust mechanisms, and other expenses? The miner fees can't handle it.
View OriginalReply0
TeaTimeTradervip
· 01-07 10:37
AI participants and non-participants, this framework is truly outstanding. It's completely different from the tool-based setup.
View OriginalReply0
SilentObservervip
· 01-07 10:27
AI as a participant rather than a tool—this idea has some merit.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)