Setting up an LLC structure can open the door to delegating authority to AI systems, but here's the catch—you can't skip the human element. Even with that legal wrapper in place, you still need a qualified human fiduciary who takes actual responsibility. The AI handles execution, sure, but someone has to be accountable for decisions. That's not just best practice; it's increasingly what regulators and courts expect to see. Without that human layer, the whole setup falls apart from a liability perspective.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FudVaccinatorvip
· 01-07 21:59
Basically, no matter how awesome AI is, someone has to take the blame.
View OriginalReply0
Blockchainiacvip
· 01-07 21:55
Basically, no matter how awesome AI is, someone has to take the blame, right here.
View OriginalReply0
PanicSeller69vip
· 01-07 21:54
NGL, that's why those who want complete automation will eventually hit a snag... People still have to take the blame.
View OriginalReply0
ConfusedWhalevip
· 01-07 21:45
In plain terms, no matter how awesome AI is, someone has to take the blame—that's the real truth.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainUndercovervip
· 01-07 21:44
Basically, it's still the part of passing the blame; no matter how awesome AI is, someone has to take the fall.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)