2026-01-08 14:25:58

SUI Group, as the Nasdaq-listed SUI Treasury Company, has recently disclosed attention-grabbing financial data. As of January 7, the company's total SUI holdings have surged to 108,098,436 tokens, with a market value of approximately $196 million — a scale that reflects institutional-level serious investment.

More notably, the company has spent about $15.75 million to repurchase 7,801,042 common shares, accounting for 8.80% of the issued shares. This is not an impulsive move but a strategic plan — the board had already approved a $50 million buyback budget, of which only about one-third has been used so far, leaving room for future actions.

From the perspective of holdings scale and buyback intensity, this company’s confidence in the SUI ecosystem is quite firm. What does a sustained buyback plan imply? It simply means using concrete actions to tell the market: this investment is long-term optimistic.

SUI-0,49%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

0xInsomnia

· 01-08 15:00

Institutions are throwing real money, and the signals are clear... Over 100 million SUI directly invested, and they keep repurchasing their own stock. Actions speak louder than words.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightSeller

· 01-08 14:56

Over 100 million SUI tokens are still being repurchased. This is putting real money into it, not just empty talk. Repurchasing usually means one of two things: either genuine confidence or market stabilization. I bet on the former. Only about one-third of the budget has been used with over 15 million USD spent so far. There's still more to come, let's see. Institution-level actions are just different; retail investors can only copy the moves. This rhythm is definitely a long-term positive signal.

View OriginalReply0

TopBuyerForever

· 01-08 14:55

No way, over 100 million SUI and only spent 15.75 million? Something's not right with this price.

View OriginalReply0

CrossChainBreather

· 01-08 14:55

1.08 billion SUI tokens, $196 million market cap... This wave of institutional positioning is really going all in. --- Buying back $50 million worth with only one-third spent? There’s still room to go, what is this hinting at? --- Long-term optimism sounds great, but the key is whether it can withstand the bear market. --- If a Nasdaq-listed company does this... it shows that the SUI ecosystem really has something. --- Continuous buybacks + heavy holdings, this combo looks very comfortable. --- Wait, only one-third of $15.75 million buyback used? There’s still over $30 million in ammunition... --- If institutions play like this, will retail investors follow or not? That’s the real question. --- A holding scale close to $200 million market cap, how much confidence does that show in SUI? --- What’s the logic behind the board approving a $50 million budget? --- So should we get on now or wait and see? These numbers are pretty convincing.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropLicker

· 01-08 14:51

1.96 billion dollars in holdings... How confident are they in SUI? They haven't even used up the buyback budget yet, so they'll definitely keep pumping in the future. Wait, if institutions play like this, won't retail investors be safe to follow? Reliable companies operate differently; they speak with real money. I'm a bit tempted to get in... but I need to watch a bit more. This round of buyback is really aggressive; it's not just talk, they're actually spending money.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-40edb63b

· 01-08 14:42

Institutions are really pouring money in. The scale of 196 million is no joke. The buyback hasn't even reached half of the target yet, and more will be invested later. This is probably a sign of confidence. Is SUI about to take off? Or is it another opportunity to cut? Whatever, I'm going to stock up first.

View OriginalReply0