In the decentralized storage race, different solutions have their trade-offs. Some projects emphasize permanent data recording, while others focus on passive retention mechanisms. But what truly appeals to enterprise users are those solutions that can both protect privacy and meet compliance requirements.
Recently, I came across an interesting idea—allowing users to actively manage their data lifecycle. This means you can modify or delete your data blocks while maintaining transparency of transaction history through blockchain records. This balanced approach is especially suitable for highly sensitive industries like finance and healthcare.
The accompanying access control protocol enables encrypted storage of sensitive information and allows fine-grained permissions on who can access it. In comparison, an average annual cost of $50/TB is quite competitive and has already attracted compliance projects like media and 3D design platforms to join the ecosystem.
From an incentive perspective, nodes are rewarded for participating in compliant storage, further strengthening the network’s support for enterprise-level services. It can be said that this design logic is bringing Web2 enterprises closer to Web3 infrastructure—not as a disruptive replacement, but as a pragmatic upgrade choice.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FOMOmonster
· 21h ago
$50 per T is indeed cheap, but the key question is whether it can really be deleted... I'm still a bit skeptical about the stuff written into the blockchain.
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekConfession
· 01-08 15:06
Oh, this is the right way. Don't mess around with those messy permanent storage solutions.
Finally, someone understands that privacy + compliance are the real selling points for enterprises.
$50 per T, honestly, it's more reasonable than I expected. In finance and healthcare, this is indeed how it should be done.
Incentive mechanisms tied to compliant services—smart move. Only then can you attract genuine project partners with real money.
But it still depends on whether the node ecosystem can truly expand; otherwise, even the best logic is useless.
View OriginalReply0
FalseProfitProphet
· 01-08 15:04
$50 for a T, can you still delete data? This is what enterprises want, not those stubborn chains that refuse to change.
View OriginalReply0
Web3Educator
· 01-08 14:41
honestly, this hits different - finally seeing someone articulate why enterprises actually care about web3 infrastructure. the data lifecycle management angle? that's the real innovation tbh. not "decentralize everything" but "let me actually control my stuff while staying compliant"
In the decentralized storage race, different solutions have their trade-offs. Some projects emphasize permanent data recording, while others focus on passive retention mechanisms. But what truly appeals to enterprise users are those solutions that can both protect privacy and meet compliance requirements.
Recently, I came across an interesting idea—allowing users to actively manage their data lifecycle. This means you can modify or delete your data blocks while maintaining transparency of transaction history through blockchain records. This balanced approach is especially suitable for highly sensitive industries like finance and healthcare.
The accompanying access control protocol enables encrypted storage of sensitive information and allows fine-grained permissions on who can access it. In comparison, an average annual cost of $50/TB is quite competitive and has already attracted compliance projects like media and 3D design platforms to join the ecosystem.
From an incentive perspective, nodes are rewarded for participating in compliant storage, further strengthening the network’s support for enterprise-level services. It can be said that this design logic is bringing Web2 enterprises closer to Web3 infrastructure—not as a disruptive replacement, but as a pragmatic upgrade choice.