2026-01-08 15:25:07

Honestly, I really don't favor this type of project. The biggest risk in choosing projects is chasing after high prices and taking over the position; you need to be more cautious. The market is not short of concepts, but what is truly lacking are things that can be practically implemented. Instead of betting on new projects, it's better to look for those with solid fundamentals and mature ecosystems, so you can have peace of mind.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidationHunter

· 10h ago

The principle is sound, but the worry is that there are too many bagholders.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightGenesis

· 01-08 15:54

On-chain data shows that deploying such contracts is all just a routine. I monitored a few late at night, and from the code, they are riddled with vulnerabilities. Notably, the liquidity pools have long been prepared for a dump. Based on past experience, fundamentally solid projects wouldn't rush to raise funds like this.

View OriginalReply0

WalletWhisperer

· 01-08 15:50

the accumulation patterns don't lie tho... most retail just can't read the on-chain footprints before they fomo in. watched three wallets cluster around this exact narrative last week—classic distribution setup masked as fundamentals talk

Reply0

LiquidityHunter

· 01-08 15:48

Really, those who buy high and take the loss are all newbies.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoSurvivor