2026-01-08 15:31:48

I just saw an interesting move—Ethereum treasury company SharpLink recently deployed $170 million worth of ETH on Linea. What's more attractive is the yield strategy they are using.

How exactly do they do it? SharpLink combines Ethereum's native yields, EigenCloud's re-staking rewards, along with direct incentives from Linea and ether.fi. This multi-layered yield source combination is quite an innovative approach in the current market.

Security is also guaranteed— all assets are managed by Anchorage Digital, a institutional-grade qualified custodian. This is a common practice in traditional finance, indicating that the project has put effort into risk control. From the scale of deployment and scheme design, SharpLink seems to be exploring how to make the liquidity of the Ethereum ecosystem more fully realize its value on L2.

ETH-0,56%

ETHFI-2,25%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CryptoCross-TalkClub

· 01-11 14:54

Laughing to death, I would like to call this set of combo moves "Profit Stacking Roman Style," but I'm just worried that if one link collapses, everything will be buried with it. $170 million, everyone. They really dare to push it. The custodian's writing is flashy, but in the end, trust is still required. I've seen this many times. Multi-layered returns sound good, but in reality, it just stacks all the risks together. Bull market is fun for a while, bear market is a crematorium. If you want to talk about innovation, it's more like stuffing all the rewards that can be squeezed in. Anyway, the little guys don't mind having more rewards. Anchorage Digital's endorsement is indeed a bit interesting, but a custodian can't save a project from a sudden rug pull. I understand this logic. If this wave can really come out successfully, I might as well switch to performing financial stand-up comedy in public.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoCrazyGF

· 01-08 16:27

$170 million invested just for layered returns? Feels a bit greedy, could the risks be underestimated? With such thick returns, can it really generate stable income, or is it just another attractive-looking trap? Anchorage Digital custody sounds reliable, but who dares to gamble? Better to wait and see. This set of strategies has some substance, but it also seems to be testing the market's bottom line. I don't quite understand the part about re-pledging, can someone explain it? Another innovative yield scheme? I always feel like these kinds of terms lose value the more I hear them. Wait, are there really institutions using this, or is it just SharpLink hyping itself up?

View OriginalReply0

not_your_keys

· 01-08 15:56

$170 million, this move is quite aggressive. The multi-layered yield stacking really caught my attention. Plus staking + L2 incentives, SharpLink is seriously making a move. Anchorage Digital custody, at least I don't have to worry about fund security. I have to admit that.

View OriginalReply0

DiamondHands

· 01-08 15:56

$170 million directly invested, how confident must one be --- Layered yield stacking? Sounds good, just worried about which link might have issues --- Anchorage manages assets reliably, definitely more reassuring than self-custody --- Linea ecosystem is up to something again, with such fierce L2 competition --- Re-staking + native yields + incentives, this combo truly shows thoughtful planning --- Sounds good, but ultimately it all depends on the APY data --- With a scale of $170 million, they really dare to go all out --- The L2 liquidity dilemma has yet to be solved; can this time be the breakthrough? --- Institution-level custody is definitely a plus, not something small projects can do --- Anchorage's backing still carries weight, after all, it's rooted in traditional financial systems

View OriginalReply0

gas_fee_therapy

· 01-08 15:45

170 million USD thrown into Linea, this move is indeed big, but with the layered yield stacking in this combo, I feel it's a bit too perfect. Whoever truly dares to tell me the truth, what is the annualized return you can achieve?

View OriginalReply0

BetterLuckyThanSmart

· 01-08 15:37

$170 million is indeed a significant amount. --- Multiple yields stacking up, this combination punch is quite clever. --- For institutions like Anchorage to custody, at least you can sleep soundly. --- By the way, will this kind of approach be copied and overused? It feels like everyone will play it this way sooner or later. --- Liquidity on Linea indeed needs such big moves to activate. --- I'm just worried that the returns look good, but there are various issues when withdrawing. --- Adding more staking incentives sounds pretty sexy, but the risk stacking is also real. --- This strategy is still too high a threshold for small retail investors. --- Anchorage's endorsement at least shows it's not a fly-by-night project, which is worth noting. --- Investing 170 million, if the returns are still disappointing, that would be awkward.

View OriginalReply0