Many people who just started with USD1 lending arbitrage have already taken a hit, mainly falling into three major pitfalls: liquidation risk, transaction fee losses, and choosing the wrong assets. In fact, these can all be avoided; the key is to understand the rules clearly.



First, let's clarify the matter of liquidation. Many think that as long as there are collateral assets, borrowing some coins to use is no problem—until market fluctuations cause the collateral ratio to spike, leading to forced liquidation. Essentially, when the price of collateral assets drops, the collateral ratio rises. Once it exceeds the 70% liquidation threshold, your position becomes at risk. How to solve this? Simply and straightforwardly—beginners should not be greedy; keep the collateral ratio well below 60%, leaving at least a 10 percentage point buffer.

Here's a practical example: you use $100,000 worth of BTCB as collateral and borrow up to $60,000 USD1. Even if BTCB's price drops by 15%, the collateral ratio only rises to 69%, which won't trigger liquidation. In extreme market conditions, there are two ways to save yourself: either continue adding collateral assets or directly repay part of USD1 to lower the ratio. Never rely on luck.

Transaction fees are also often overlooked. Gas fees on BNB Chain and Ethereum are worlds apart—BNB Chain costs just a few dollars, while Ethereum can easily cost dozens of dollars, eating into your profits. When choosing a chain, this factor must be carefully considered.

For asset selection, beginners should honestly stick to blue-chip assets like BTCB and BNB, and avoid small-cap coins and high-leverage derivatives. As for yield-bearing tokens like PT-USDe and asUSDF, although the returns are tempting, their operation processes are more complex. It's better to master basic arbitrage first before trying these out. Also, beware of fake links; always operate through official channels and avoid giving assets to phishing sites.
USD1-0,01%
BNB0,62%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
HashRatePhilosophervip
· 13h ago
A 60% collateralization rate is truly a lifesaver, a painful lesson, brothers.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSqueezervip
· 20h ago
Maintaining a collateralization ratio within 60% is a must for likes, otherwise you're just asking for trouble. --- Gas fees vary so much; choosing the wrong chain can directly lead to bankruptcy. That's funny. --- More than half of the fees are eaten up, and you're still calculating returns? Wake up, everyone. --- The most common mistake for beginners is greed. They end up liquidated and still regret it. --- Why are people still playing Ethereum when BNB Chain costs are so low? Do they have too much money? --- I think the biggest trap is fake links. Too many people get phished and don't realize it. --- Adding collateral assets is a good trick, but only if you still have money in your pocket. Not everyone can do that. --- Blue-chip assets are stable, but the returns are too low. It's frustrating. --- In extreme market conditions, no strategy works. Technical analysis is pretty much useless. --- PT-USDe and similar are too complicated. Let the big players research that; we'll stick to basic stuff.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetectivevip
· 20h ago
According to on-chain data, there is indeed a pattern to this wave of USD1 arbitrage liquidation mode—by tracking those wallets that are forcibly liquidated, I found that the vast majority are being liquidated within the 60-70% collateralization ratio range. The logic behind this is quite interesting. After analysis and judgment, the claim that "as long as there is collateral, it’s stable" is essentially self-deception—obvious fund correlation data has long pointed to the same truth: volatility is always the trigger for liquidation, not the collateral assets themselves. Additionally, I noticed a suspicious trading pattern; the hidden fees are really a form of covert harvesting—The cost difference between BNB Chain and Ethereum is not simply a Gas issue, and there may also be hidden MEV losses involved. The key point is that those small-cap coin phishing links have already linked to at least three suspicious wallet behaviors. I recommend that beginners really avoid touching them.
View OriginalReply0
BitcoinDaddyvip
· 20h ago
Stick to within 60%, this is the way to survive. How many people have been liquidated directly because they were greedy for that 10% profit?
View OriginalReply0
New_Ser_Ngmivip
· 20h ago
Basically, don't be greedy; keep it within 60% to feel at ease.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)