2026-01-09 20:23:27

Recently, the primary market in the BSC ecosystem seems to have gained some momentum, but I always seem to miss the best opportunities. Watching others catch projects with good gains, I can't help but feel a bit regretful.

But to be honest, I've always wanted to understand—can those who sweep the chain with high intensity over 24 hours really hold onto their profits? Data shows that the success rate of most ultra-high-frequency strategies isn't as high as one might imagine. Instead of envying others' returns, it's better to go back to fundamentals, honestly manage risks, and participate in projects with real value. After all, stable small gains often beat the unpredictable big profits.

In the end, I still have to ask myself—did I truly understand, or am I just trying to make quick money?

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-e87b21ee

· 10h ago

Alright, it sounds good, but I just want to ask how many people can really stick to doing fundamental analysis. The group of people who scan chains 24/7 are mostly doomed to cut losses and exit. Instead of stressing over missed opportunities, it's better to analyze why you always miss the boat. That being said, stable returns sound simple, but in reality, it's really difficult to achieve.

View OriginalReply0

DaoResearcher

· 10h ago

According to the Tokenomics model in the white paper, the fundamental cause of this FOMO mentality is actually the game imbalance caused by incompatible incentive mechanisms. It is worth noting that most participants overlook the risk-adjusted Sharpe ratio. From on-chain data performance, ultra-high-frequency strategies indeed underperform expectations within the 95% confidence interval, but the crux of the problem is—have you truly understood the project's governance proposals and token release curves? Those who only focus on price increases are essentially just gambling on luck. I have also fallen into this trap myself, and later realized that a stable compound growth strategy far surpasses single large profits. This is not just motivational talk; the data speaks for itself.

View OriginalReply0

StableCoinKaren

· 01-09 20:53

That's right, I've seen too many people mess up with the 24h chain scanning method. It looks exciting but really doesn't make any money.

View OriginalReply0

HodlKumamon

· 01-09 20:52

I just want to ask, those who say they've made a profit, how many actually hold on without selling... Do data lie? Let's see, most of the high-frequency traders in 24 hours end up riding the rebound, that's how rational the bears are.

View OriginalReply0

NewPumpamentals

· 01-09 20:50

That's right, I often regret it too, but the 24-hour chain scanning method is really exhausting, and in the end, you still lose more than you gain. Instead of chasing high-frequency trading, it's better to honestly find a few projects with solid underlying logic, so your sleep quality can improve. Really, changing the mindset from chasing quick money has made the returns more stable.

View OriginalReply0

DegenTherapist

· 01-09 20:47

That's right, I've also seen too many stories of people who scan the chain 24/7 and end up running away. Understanding the project and making quick money are indeed two different things, but it's really difficult.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedDreams

· 01-09 20:40

I took a look at someone else's profit sheet, then looked at my own ledger... It really stings. Honestly, I tried the 24-hour chain scanning method, and in the end, I lost even faster. Fundamentals are probably the key to survival.

View OriginalReply0