Decentralized prediction market platform Polymarket is accelerating its mainstream adoption. Following collaborations with Dow Jones Media and Delphi Digital, it has now become the exclusive prediction market partner for the Golden Globe Awards. Behind these moves lies Polymarket’s ambition to transform from a speculative tool into a financial infrastructure, but it also faces significant regulatory challenges.
Polymarket’s Business Expansion is Rapidly Accelerating
From Speculation to Mainstream: A Three-Step Leap
In just a few days, Polymarket announced several high-profile partnerships. On January 7, it signed an exclusive agreement with Dow Jones Media Group to supply prediction data to top financial media such as The Wall Street Journal and Barron’s. The same day, it launched a real estate price prediction market with property data platform Parcl, covering major US cities. On January 8, it partnered with crypto research firm Delphi Digital to launch 11 markets. By January 10, the official Golden Globe Awards announced Polymarket as its exclusive prediction market partner.
What do these collaborations have in common? They are all transforming Polymarket from a pure speculation platform into a provider of data and insights.
Comparison of Partnership Landscape
Partner
Collaboration Details
Significance
Dow Jones Media
Providing prediction data to WSJ, Barron’s
Entering mainstream financial media
Delphi Digital
Launching 11 markets, embedding research reports
Tying with professional research institutions
Parcl
Real estate price prediction markets
Expanding into the real estate sector
Golden Globe Awards
Exclusive prediction market partner
Recognition in entertainment and culture
Rising Regulatory Risks
Insider Trading Controversy as a Turning Point
Polymarket’s rapid expansion has not been smooth sailing. Recent events in Venezuela have sparked serious questions about platform compliance. According to reports, three hours before US military intervention in Venezuela, an account precisely bet $30,000 on the prediction “Maduro stepping down,” later earning $400,000. The funds were traced to individuals linked to the Trump administration. After the incident, the platform adjusted settlement rules for related predictions, causing dissatisfaction among many users.
This is not an isolated case. The platform has faced rule changes and settlement disputes in multiple predictions involving US politics and military actions.
Legislative Constraints
More severely, regulators have begun to act. According to reports, 30 Democrats, including former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, are supporting the “2026 Financial Prediction Market Public Integrity Act.” The core goal of this bill is to prevent elected officials from trading on prediction markets related to political events.
The introduction of this bill directly targets issues of insider trading and conflicts of interest on platforms like Polymarket.
The Contradiction Between Mainstreaming and Compliance
Polymarket’s Dilemma
On one hand, Polymarket has quickly gained legitimacy and exposure through collaborations with mainstream media, research institutions, and major events. These partnerships help shed the “gambling tool” label and position prediction markets as “infrastructure pursuing truth” (a definition from Delphi Digital).
On the other hand, frequent insider trading incidents and rule modifications are attracting regulatory attention. The $400,000 profit in the Venezuela case, flexible rule adjustments, and connections with political figures serve as evidence for critics.
Uncertain Future
If the “2026 Financial Prediction Market Public Integrity Act” ultimately passes, the operational space for prediction markets will be significantly restricted. Elected officials would be prohibited from trading on these platforms, potentially impacting trading volume and liquidity. More importantly, it could open the door for other regulatory measures.
From another perspective, regulated oversight could also present opportunities for Polymarket. If the platform can pass compliance checks, its position relative to competitors could be strengthened, and mainstream financial institutions’ trust in it could increase.
Summary
Polymarket is at a critical turning point. The Golden Globe partnership, Dow Jones data supply, and Delphi Digital alliance all indicate that the platform is rapidly mainstreaming. But at the same time, insider trading controversies, Democratic anti-insider legislation, and trust crises caused by rule changes serve as reminders: mainstreaming may come at the cost of losing certain freedoms.
From a speculative tool to a financial infrastructure, from on-chain wild growth to mainstream media recognition, Polymarket’s story is far from over. The key going forward is whether the platform can maintain growth under regulatory pressure and how it balances compliance with innovation. The answer may determine the future of the entire prediction market sector.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Polymarket Goes Mainstream: The Ambitions and Risks Behind the Golden Globe Awards Partnership
Decentralized prediction market platform Polymarket is accelerating its mainstream adoption. Following collaborations with Dow Jones Media and Delphi Digital, it has now become the exclusive prediction market partner for the Golden Globe Awards. Behind these moves lies Polymarket’s ambition to transform from a speculative tool into a financial infrastructure, but it also faces significant regulatory challenges.
Polymarket’s Business Expansion is Rapidly Accelerating
From Speculation to Mainstream: A Three-Step Leap
In just a few days, Polymarket announced several high-profile partnerships. On January 7, it signed an exclusive agreement with Dow Jones Media Group to supply prediction data to top financial media such as The Wall Street Journal and Barron’s. The same day, it launched a real estate price prediction market with property data platform Parcl, covering major US cities. On January 8, it partnered with crypto research firm Delphi Digital to launch 11 markets. By January 10, the official Golden Globe Awards announced Polymarket as its exclusive prediction market partner.
What do these collaborations have in common? They are all transforming Polymarket from a pure speculation platform into a provider of data and insights.
Comparison of Partnership Landscape
Rising Regulatory Risks
Insider Trading Controversy as a Turning Point
Polymarket’s rapid expansion has not been smooth sailing. Recent events in Venezuela have sparked serious questions about platform compliance. According to reports, three hours before US military intervention in Venezuela, an account precisely bet $30,000 on the prediction “Maduro stepping down,” later earning $400,000. The funds were traced to individuals linked to the Trump administration. After the incident, the platform adjusted settlement rules for related predictions, causing dissatisfaction among many users.
This is not an isolated case. The platform has faced rule changes and settlement disputes in multiple predictions involving US politics and military actions.
Legislative Constraints
More severely, regulators have begun to act. According to reports, 30 Democrats, including former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, are supporting the “2026 Financial Prediction Market Public Integrity Act.” The core goal of this bill is to prevent elected officials from trading on prediction markets related to political events.
The introduction of this bill directly targets issues of insider trading and conflicts of interest on platforms like Polymarket.
The Contradiction Between Mainstreaming and Compliance
Polymarket’s Dilemma
On one hand, Polymarket has quickly gained legitimacy and exposure through collaborations with mainstream media, research institutions, and major events. These partnerships help shed the “gambling tool” label and position prediction markets as “infrastructure pursuing truth” (a definition from Delphi Digital).
On the other hand, frequent insider trading incidents and rule modifications are attracting regulatory attention. The $400,000 profit in the Venezuela case, flexible rule adjustments, and connections with political figures serve as evidence for critics.
Uncertain Future
If the “2026 Financial Prediction Market Public Integrity Act” ultimately passes, the operational space for prediction markets will be significantly restricted. Elected officials would be prohibited from trading on these platforms, potentially impacting trading volume and liquidity. More importantly, it could open the door for other regulatory measures.
From another perspective, regulated oversight could also present opportunities for Polymarket. If the platform can pass compliance checks, its position relative to competitors could be strengthened, and mainstream financial institutions’ trust in it could increase.
Summary
Polymarket is at a critical turning point. The Golden Globe partnership, Dow Jones data supply, and Delphi Digital alliance all indicate that the platform is rapidly mainstreaming. But at the same time, insider trading controversies, Democratic anti-insider legislation, and trust crises caused by rule changes serve as reminders: mainstreaming may come at the cost of losing certain freedoms.
From a speculative tool to a financial infrastructure, from on-chain wild growth to mainstream media recognition, Polymarket’s story is far from over. The key going forward is whether the platform can maintain growth under regulatory pressure and how it balances compliance with innovation. The answer may determine the future of the entire prediction market sector.