Here's a thought-provoking take on the relationship between energy policy and international conflict.

When a major economy remains heavily dependent on fossil fuels—particularly when oil and coal make up roughly 70% of its energy structure—the incentive to secure those resources often overrides other considerations. This dependency creates pressures that can lead toward geopolitical tensions and resource competition.

Now flip the scenario. What if that same economy fully committed to the Paris Agreement framework and replaced that 70% with renewable energy sources? The entire calculus shifts dramatically. Without the need to control global oil and coal supplies, the underlying driver for many resource-based conflicts simply vanishes.

This isn't just environmental philosophy—it's about economic incentives. When energy becomes abundant, renewable, and domestically producible, entire geopolitical dynamics transform. The motivation to compete for scarce resources diminishes. Cooperation becomes more economically rational than conflict.

The implication is clear: energy transition isn't just a climate issue. It's fundamentally about reshaping how nations interact, compete, and build relationships on the global stage.