2026-01-12 00:27:49

What's the real impact on Ethereum when algorithmic shifts occur in the market? The interconnection between protocol dynamics and trading algorithms deserves closer examination.

ETH0,54%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BuyTheTop

· 7h ago

When the algorithm changes, the market gets chaotic—who can predict that? It sounds like a false proposition.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterKing

· 8h ago

Once Algorithm 1 moves, Ethereum gets slapped in the face. I've seen this happen many times. During that last wave last year, I almost got trapped. Now I always keep an eye on the contract interaction data of trading pairs, afraid of being drained again by bots. Basically, it's the protocol layer and the algorithm layer competing against each other, and retail investors like us can only pray that gas fees don't spike too wildly.

View OriginalReply0

ParanoiaKing

· 15h ago

Whenever the algorithm moves, does Ethereum have to follow the dance again? To put it simply, it's still those big players playing tricks.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanLord

· 15h ago

Algorithm One switches to ETH and trembles. The nice way to say it is "protocol dynamics," but I just want to know who is really making money off whom.

View OriginalReply0

WinterWarmthCat

· 15h ago

Algorithm's fluctuations in ETH will get harvested... To be honest, everyone can see through this coordinated move, but the ones who can truly take advantage are still those big players.

View OriginalReply0

UncommonNPC

· 15h ago

When Algorithm 1 moves, does ETH have to follow suit? I think it's not that simple... The interaction between the protocol layer and trading bots really needs to be carefully examined, or else no one will understand what's going on.

View OriginalReply0