Paradoxically, it's the institutions bound by rigorous compliance frameworks that warrant the most confidence. Why? They operate under continuous pressure to demonstrate tangible returns and justify their existence to stakeholders. Add layers of regulatory scrutiny into the mix—audits, oversight, compliance obligations—and you've got built-in accountability mechanisms. They can't simply disappear or pivot recklessly; the system forces them to deliver, season after season. That structural discipline, ironically, becomes their strongest credential in an industry often haunted by bad actors flying under the radar.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LightningSentryvip
· 12h ago
Ha, that's right. The unregulated ones have all run away, while those with licenses still have to play by the rules.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseFOMOguyvip
· 12h ago
Haha, that's why I've always said that traditional financial institutions are actually more reliable in crypto. It's really ironic.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenYieldvip
· 12h ago
ngl this is just regulatory arbitrage wrapped in moral language. sure, compliance theater keeps the suits honest, but have you seen their risk-adjusted returns? not exactly outperforming the "bad actors" they're so keen to distance themselves from.
Reply0
DegenWhisperervip
· 12h ago
This logic is a bit crazy... Has the regulatory framework actually become a guarantee of trust?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)