
In the digital age, “centralized rulers” typically refer to technology companies, platforms, or financial institutions that possess significant control and resources. These entities can determine whether users can access services, how data is used, and even the distribution of economic resources, which presents risks of censorship, control, and even abuse of power. This trend is contrary to the spirit of blockchain, which is precisely the issue that Vitalik has repeatedly emphasized in his latest declaration.
Vitalik recently emphasized on social media that Ethereum is not just a technical product, but a rebellion against centralization. He proposed that the network should have the ability to “prevent fraud, resist censorship, and operate without third-party intervention”. This is not only a technical goal, but also represents an ideology: power should not be concentrated in the hands of a few entities.
Vitalik further pointed out that traditional tools such as wallets, books, and even everyday items have not been locked down by companies in the past, while modern digital resources may be controlled due to centralized strategies. This contradiction highlights the necessity of decentralized design.
As a core underlying chain, Ethereum is advancing a series of technical improvements to support its vision. For example, the PeerDAS feature is now active on the mainnet, and ZK-EVM has entered the alpha stage. These advancements help to enhance network speed, reduce costs, and improve the efficiency of the decentralized consensus mechanism.
At the same time, there are actions within the community such as the “Trustless Manifesto” advocating for a reduction in reliance on centralized relayers, indicating that the emphasis on maintaining decentralization within the ecosystem is strengthening.
Recently, the price of Ethereum has broken through US$3,100, accompanied by technical indicators showing some buying momentum, but it also faces the risk of a corrective pullback due to overbought conditions. The market reflects both recognition of the development of ecological technologies and a response to macro and short-term speculative sentiment.
This indicates a close relationship between the vision of decentralization and actual market performance: the more mature the technology and the more resistant the network is to censorship, the more likely its long-term value will be recognized by investors.
The advantages of decentralization are obvious: reducing the risk of single points of failure, increasing user autonomy, and promoting fair competition, among others. However, achieving complete decentralization is not an easy task. Ethereum is currently facing challenges such as PoS capital centralization, high node operating costs, and dependency on centralization in the Layer-2 ecosystem.
Vitalik and the community encourage the development of more secure wallet structures, enhanced privacy protection mechanisms, and other measures aimed at allowing users to truly control their digital assets and identities, without being controlled by large platforms.
In the coming years, if Ethereum can successfully advance multiple technical upgrades and encourage projects within the ecosystem to adhere to decentralization principles, its network will be more resilient and resistant to censorship. This not only has inspirational significance for the technology sector but could also influence the structure of the network economy and even the direction of legal policy formulation.
Vitalik Buterin’s latest proposal for a decentralized vision in 2026 is a unification of the technological progress and philosophical ideas of the Ethereum ecosystem. It is not only a declaration against centralization but also sets a model for the entire blockchain field to adhere to decentralization and resist the trend of power concentration. As technology and market advance in synchrony, this “rebellion” may become an important force driving the development of the digital economy.











