
Refinancing refers to replacing existing funds with new funds.
More specifically, it involves substituting an existing loan or funding arrangement with a new solution that offers lower costs, more suitable terms, or more flexible conditions. In traditional finance, this often takes the form of refinancing loans, issuing new bonds, or offering additional shares. In the crypto space, refinancing can mean migrating collateralized loans from Protocol A to Protocol B, using a flash loan (borrowing and repaying within a single blockchain transaction with no long-term collateral) for one-click swaps, or project teams raising new capital through exchange-based token launches (such as IEOs, or Initial Exchange Offerings).
The main objectives of refinancing typically fall into three categories: reducing interest rates and expenses, extending repayment periods and improving cash flow, and optimizing collateral and risk structures.
Because it can lower costs, stabilize cash flow, and reduce risk.
For individuals and teams, even a 1%-5% decrease in interest rates can significantly improve cash flow. For example, borrowing 100,000 USDT at an annual rate dropping from 12% to 6% cuts yearly interest payments from 12,000 to 6,000 USDT. Even after accounting for handling fees, slippage, and on-chain costs totaling 100-200 USDT, the net savings remain substantial.
In the crypto market, where prices are highly volatile, declines in collateral value can increase liquidation risks. By refinancing to protocols with lower interest rates or higher liquidation thresholds, or by converting leveraged positions to more appropriate margin models, users can significantly improve their safety margins.
For projects or miners, refinancing means obtaining working capital without sacrificing long-term development prospects. This could involve raising funds through convertible bonds or token launches on exchanges to expand operations or weather downturns.
The process involves first settling old debts before establishing new ones.
In traditional finance, banks offer new loans to pay off old ones and renegotiate interest rates and terms. On-chain, the process is more flexible: it can be done in two steps (“repay first, then borrow”), or via flash loans that complete the cycle—borrow new funds, repay the old loan, take out a new loan, and repay the flash loan—all in a single transaction.
For example, migrating DeFi collateralized loans from Protocol A to Protocol B:
Step 1: Calculate potential gains. Compare old and new interest rates, fees, prepayment penalties, expected slippage, and gas costs to ensure that the “annualized rate difference × principal × remaining term” outweighs the total cost.
Step 2: Choose the migration path. Users familiar with smart contracts may opt for a flash loan route (completing repayment and re-borrowing in one transaction with minimal price exposure), or use a manual two-step process: repay a small amount to free up some collateral, then borrow from the new protocol and use those funds to repay the remaining old debt.
Step 3: Execute and verify. After migration, check the new position’s Loan-to-Value (LTV), liquidation price, stability fee or variable rate parameters, and set up price and health factor alerts.
For margin or loan refinancing on exchanges (using Gate as an example):
Step 1: Check the daily/annual borrowing rates and tiered rules for your target asset on Gate’s margin or lending pages. Record your current position cost.
Step 2: Open a new position on a pair with lower rates or a more suitable margin model, or use cheaper funds to repay your old liabilities—thus “swapping debt.”
Step 3: Adjust your margin ratio and risk parameters to reserve a buffer and avoid executing during periods of high volatility.
Refinancing is most common in lending, project fundraising, and mining fund management.
In DeFi lending, users move collateralized loans from protocols with higher interest rates to those with lower rates, higher liquidation thresholds, or better rewards. For example, moving a stablecoin loan collateralized by ETH from Protocol A (8% APR) to Protocol B (6% APR) can be completed instantly using a flash loan, minimizing market exposure.
In exchange-based margin or borrowing scenarios, users migrate debt during periods of rate volatility. For example, if stablecoin borrowing rates spike on Gate during peak hours, users may repay old debts first and then re-borrow during periods with more stable rates or on pairs with lower costs.
At the project financing level, teams may raise working capital through token launches or token-based bonds. For instance, projects participating in Gate’s Startup token launches receive operating funds via token sales—a broad form of refinancing from a capital structure perspective.
In mining and infrastructure sectors, Bitcoin miners often refinance by using equipment-collateralized loans, convertible bonds, or equity financing to extend operations or expand capacity. They may also use BTC as collateral to obtain stablecoins for paying electricity bills—effectively substituting new debt for previous expenditure pressure.
In NFT and real-world asset (RWA) lending markets, holders may migrate matured or high-interest loans to platforms offering lower rates or longer terms to reduce liquidation risk.
Rely on detailed cost-benefit analysis and risk management parameters.
Start with a simple calculation: Potential savings = (old annual rate − new annual rate) × principal × remaining term; Total costs = prepayment penalties + platform fees + slippage + tax implications + gas/on-chain fees. Only execute when potential savings significantly exceed total costs.
Control your LTV and liquidation risk. Keep your loan size within safe limits; allow at least a 10%-20% price buffer; set alerts for price movements, health factors, and margin calls.
Operate in batches and small amounts during low congestion periods. Test the full process with small amounts first before scaling up; avoid major data releases or high volatility windows to reduce risks from simultaneous price and rate swings.
Choose top-tier platforms and auditable contracts. Prioritize protocols and major exchanges with thorough audits, transparent risk controls, and proven track records. Monitor announcements about contract upgrades, interest rate models, and liquidation parameter changes.
Pay attention to hidden terms and tax issues. Read early repayment clauses, rate adjustment rules, and reward vesting periods; for project-side refinancing, comply with disclosure requirements and vesting schedules to avoid secondary risks from compliance issues.
As of January 2026, both interest rates and on-chain transaction costs play significant roles.
On lending rate ranges: Over the past year, leading stablecoins have seen annual borrowing rates on exchanges and major DeFi protocols fluctuate between approximately 4%-15% (based on Q4 2025 published rates—always check current dashboards). The width of this range directly affects whether refinancing is worthwhile.
On-chain transaction costs: From late 2025 into early 2026, more activity has shifted to Ethereum Layer 2 solutions (such as Arbitrum and Optimism) and other low-fee environments. The total cost of a complete “repay old → borrow new → swap” cycle now typically ranges from just a few dollars up to low double digits (including protocol fees and gas), significantly lowering the barrier for small-scale refinancing.
On DeFi lending volumes: Industry dashboards observed that throughout 2025 the total TVL (Total Value Locked) in lending protocols remained in the tens of billions USD range and became increasingly concentrated among leading protocols. This means rate changes and incentive adjustments propagate more quickly—refinancing windows open and close faster.
On stablecoin supply and capital availability: Stablecoin circulation stayed elevated throughout 2025 with less correlation between volatility/risk events. For borrowers, this typically translates to more predictable borrowing depth and rate curves.
In mining and infrastructure: After the Bitcoin halving event in 2025, miners’ cash flows became more sensitive; there was an uptick in announcements of debt rollovers, equipment financing, and equity restructurings. Mining sector refinancing activity became closely linked to Bitcoin price trends and transaction fee income—impacting industry-wide capital costs.
For practical tracking, monitor these three metrics:
When rate spreads widen, costs fall, and position health remains acceptable, refinancing tends to be more cost-effective. Conversely, when conditions deteriorate it’s best to hold off—avoid swapping debt merely for the sake of change.


