
Shenzhen Longgang District and Wuxi National High-Tech Zone released policy drafts over the weekend, announcing plans to build an industrial ecosystem centered around open-source AI agent tool OpenClaw, with substantial subsidies and resource support. Despite warnings from China about the security risks of accessing personal data with OpenClaw, both regions have chosen to adopt aggressive subsidy policies to seize the opportunity, incorporating OpenClaw into the “AI+” action plan framework of the 2030 national development plan.
OpenClaw was created by Austrian developer Peter Steinberger. It is an open-source AI agent tool designed to enable individuals to accomplish tasks that previously required teamwork, realizing a “one-person company” operation model. It can handle a variety of tasks, from booking flights and organizing emails to automating complex workflows, and supports integration with AI models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and domestic Chinese models like Kimi and MiniMax.
Since its launch last November, OpenClaw has rapidly become one of the fastest-growing projects in GitHub history. Its popularity has attracted the attention of leading US AI company OpenAI—last month, OpenAI officially recruited Steinberger to develop next-generation AI agent technology. In China, Tencent held OpenClaw training sessions in Shenzhen, involving children, retirees, and software developers, reflecting the tool’s broad potential for penetration.
The policy drafts from both regions focus on different application scenarios but aim to build local AI industry clusters centered around OpenClaw:
The rapid expansion of OpenClaw has not been without obstacles. Chinese regulators and official media have explicitly pointed out security risks associated with accessing personal data—Beijing’s long-standing vigilance over cyber risks and data leaks also applies to this tool.
Notably, the policy drafts from both regions do not ignore these warnings but instead embed security requirements into the subsidy schemes—especially Wuxi Xinwu District, which explicitly states that “cloud platforms must prohibit access to sensitive data” as a prerequisite for commercialization of OpenClaw. This “advance support while maintaining control” approach is also part of the reason why OpenClaw policies have garnered attention at the ongoing National People’s Congress.
“One-person company” refers to individuals using OpenClaw to automate tasks that previously required multiple people, such as automating client communication, scheduling, and data organization. Solo developers or freelancers can thus deliver services at a fraction of traditional company costs. Shenzhen Longgang’s policies are designed to support this trend by providing office and computing resources.
Regulators are mainly concerned about how OpenClaw accesses personal data. As a tool that connects to multiple AI models and automates tasks, it may access sensitive information like emails, calendars, and contacts. When involving cross-border data transfer, there is a risk of violating Chinese data protection laws. This is why Wuxi Xinwu District explicitly requires cloud platforms to prohibit access to sensitive data in its subsidy policies.
This “support while regulating” approach is common in China’s high-tech industry—local governments prefer to establish industry ecosystems early to avoid missing technological windows before regulations are fully developed. Longgang District, as the first to establish an AI and Robotics Bureau nationwide, exemplifies Shenzhen’s proactive policy stance. The attention from the National People’s Congress on OpenClaw applications further provides political backing for this strategy.