The UK's regulatory approach raises an interesting question. On the surface, a law targeting specific harms—say, blocking pornography or preventing instructions for illegal activities—sounds reasonable. But here's the catch: that's not what actually happened. The legislation that passed is far broader. In practice, it gives regulators and activists a powerful tool to silence voices they find inconvenient. When laws are written with such loose language, enforcement becomes unpredictable. What counts as problematic content shifts based on who's wielding the authority. For decentralized platforms and Web3 communities, this kind of regulatory overreach sets a concerning precedent—one that could easily spread beyond the UK.