Looking at Monad's architecture, it essentially functions as a tax-loss harvesting mechanism rather than delivering genuine innovation. The chain's model appears optimized for capturing short-term arbitrage opportunities and creating paper losses for accounting purposes, rather than solving fundamental blockchain scalability or usability problems. This approach might generate trading activity in the short term, but it raises questions about whether the underlying infrastructure actually contributes meaningful value to the ecosystem or simply redistributes existing capital between participants.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
liquiditea_sipper
· 2025-12-18 17:00
monad is just a routine for harvesting profits, nothing innovative about it.
View OriginalReply0
NeverPresent
· 2025-12-17 14:18
Another project that cuts leeks, claiming to innovate while engaging in arbitrage...
View OriginalReply0
SignatureDenied
· 2025-12-17 07:57
Once again, it's the same old "seemingly innovative but actually just a money grab" trick. Monad has definitely gone a bit too far this time.
View OriginalReply0
SeasonedInvestor
· 2025-12-16 02:01
Is this the same old trick of using multiple layers to scam investors? Do they really think we're fools?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 2025-12-16 01:57
Yet another new trick to cut leeks; Monad is just a paper game.
View OriginalReply0
FarmToRiches
· 2025-12-16 01:47
Basically, it's just a different name for the "cutting leeks" scheme, there's really no innovation.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_APY_2000
· 2025-12-16 01:47
Monad is again playing with numbers, nothing meaningful.
Looking at Monad's architecture, it essentially functions as a tax-loss harvesting mechanism rather than delivering genuine innovation. The chain's model appears optimized for capturing short-term arbitrage opportunities and creating paper losses for accounting purposes, rather than solving fundamental blockchain scalability or usability problems. This approach might generate trading activity in the short term, but it raises questions about whether the underlying infrastructure actually contributes meaningful value to the ecosystem or simply redistributes existing capital between participants.