Spent quite some time pondering how to capture opportunities like $B and $AIA that could potentially increase a hundredfold. After repeatedly thinking it through, I finally realized that the core element actually points to one word—people.
However, there's a common pitfall here. Many people misunderstand and think it's about digging for "insider information" or making some small moves, which often results in even greater losses. The reality is quite the opposite. The truly reliable approach is to understand the backgrounds of the people behind the project, the team's execution capability, and community consensus. A reputable founder and a team with successful experience tend to make their projects more likely to succeed. And those who sneak around trying to dig for insider info? They are usually destined to be the chives.
So, if you want to seize the next hundredfold opportunity, instead of wasting effort on opaque methods, it's better to spend time researching the project's track record, technical strength, and funding background. That’s the right way to find good projects.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SatoshiLeftOnRead
· 2025-12-18 16:18
That's right, but the reality is that most people still want to take shortcuts.
Doing homework is definitely more reliable than gossiping.
The team background is indeed worth digging into; you can see through those who repeatedly manipulate the market.
I don't believe anyone can really make money through insider information, unless you are the one who knows the inside scoop.
Historical records, funding backgrounds, and such are actually ways to filter out projects that are less likely to run away.
It's a bit late to wake up, but it's still much better than those who secretly inquire in dark web groups.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlertBot
· 2025-12-16 20:52
That's right, it all depends on the people. When I track projects, I also notice that those with transparent team member backgrounds and a good reputation in the community tend to be more resilient.
Conversely, those guys who constantly claim "I know the inside scoop" usually end up getting wrecked the worst. That's how retail investors get chopped.
View OriginalReply0
RektButSmiling
· 2025-12-16 03:10
That's right, it all depends on the person. I've also fallen into the trap of following the crowd before, now I always look into the team's background before taking action.
A hundredfold opportunity is inherently rare; instead of digging for inside information, it’s more reliable to focus on funding and technological accumulation.
People really are the deciding factor; projects led by star teams do tend to perform differently.
Can you analyze how to judge whether a founder is reliable? I always worry about being misled.
The most annoying thing about a failed project is discovering later that the team had no industry experience at all.
I completely agree with not inquiring about inside information; those who truly make money quietly study the fundamentals.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWanderingPoet
· 2025-12-16 03:10
You're right, it all depends on the person and the team. Those brothers who are constantly checking the news, nine out of ten of them end up getting caught holding the bag.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-4a970d49
· 2025-12-16 03:04
Which one is good
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-42b277b3
· 2025-12-16 03:02
Those who like projects are "architects"
View OriginalReply0
DisillusiionOracle
· 2025-12-16 02:59
That's right, after doing this for so long, I realize that chasing inside information is actually the stupidest thing.
The team is indeed the key—just see if the people are reliable and trustworthy.
Things like hundredfold opportunities are actually hidden in the effort of research.
View OriginalReply0
Phoenix
· 2025-12-16 02:54
What do you think about this project? Any insights?
Spent quite some time pondering how to capture opportunities like $B and $AIA that could potentially increase a hundredfold. After repeatedly thinking it through, I finally realized that the core element actually points to one word—people.
However, there's a common pitfall here. Many people misunderstand and think it's about digging for "insider information" or making some small moves, which often results in even greater losses. The reality is quite the opposite. The truly reliable approach is to understand the backgrounds of the people behind the project, the team's execution capability, and community consensus. A reputable founder and a team with successful experience tend to make their projects more likely to succeed. And those who sneak around trying to dig for insider info? They are usually destined to be the chives.
So, if you want to seize the next hundredfold opportunity, instead of wasting effort on opaque methods, it's better to spend time researching the project's track record, technical strength, and funding background. That’s the right way to find good projects.