The current common issues with AI agents are obvious: isolated systems operating independently, data being locked, and lack of network effects. This is similar to the MySpace era—seemingly powerful features but actually fragmented information islands.
Real transformation requires a unified infrastructure. Imagine an AI agent Facebook moment—based on a sovereign graph, supporting fiat currency settlements, built-in zero-knowledge privacy protection, and an underlying architecture that cannot be attacked. Only such a system can enable all participants to connect and interoperate, forming network value.
This turning point is approaching. Some teams are already building such a next-generation default layer, trying to become the infrastructure for the entire AI agent ecosystem. The reshaping of the future pattern is happening through this technological iteration.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidatorFlash
· 2025-12-19 03:11
Hmm... Another story about "next-generation infrastructure." But the question is, how much can the collateralization ratio guarantee? Can smart contracts really be immune to attacks?
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanPrince
· 2025-12-16 03:53
Hmm... feels like we're back to talking about infrastructure stories. I'm tired of the analogy comparing MySpace to Facebook, haha.
Another big pie of interoperability—let's wait and see who can really pull it off.
View OriginalReply0
MetaNeighbor
· 2025-12-16 03:48
That's right, currently AI agents are indeed fragmented and can't generate network effects at all.
Wait, who's building this infrastructure? Can you name them?
The analogy of MySpace versus Facebook is outdated, but it does hit the point. The question is, how many people will actually migrate...
Claiming that the underlying architecture cannot be attacked? That's a bit too optimistic, haha.
Interoperability sounds great, but how can data privacy be truly protected? It probably will just be another PPT plan.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSupportGroup
· 2025-12-16 03:47
Well said. Currently, AI agents are indeed fragmented beyond recognition.
Wait, can zero-knowledge privacy really be implemented? Or is it just another hype?
The sovereignty graph sounds promising, but how to prevent manipulation by major players?
Are there any real projects working on this? Or are they all still at the conceptual stage?
The analogy of MySpace is so fitting; history really repeats itself.
I feel this is the true mission of Web3—interconnection rather than everyone doing their own thing.
When will we see real infrastructure being implemented? Hopefully not just another PPT.
The current common issues with AI agents are obvious: isolated systems operating independently, data being locked, and lack of network effects. This is similar to the MySpace era—seemingly powerful features but actually fragmented information islands.
Real transformation requires a unified infrastructure. Imagine an AI agent Facebook moment—based on a sovereign graph, supporting fiat currency settlements, built-in zero-knowledge privacy protection, and an underlying architecture that cannot be attacked. Only such a system can enable all participants to connect and interoperate, forming network value.
This turning point is approaching. Some teams are already building such a next-generation default layer, trying to become the infrastructure for the entire AI agent ecosystem. The reshaping of the future pattern is happening through this technological iteration.