2025-12-16 04:10:27

#大户持仓变化 The crypto market needs to wake up. Real users are the hard currency; stop being fooled by fake traffic.

What’s ironic? Some projects have invested over 10 million in genuine user bases, and after 5 years of navigating a bear market and continuous development and iteration, they still struggle to get listed on an exchange. Meanwhile, some small, makeshift projects—just two people, no technical background, purely conceptual—can easily land on top platforms.

What does this phenomenon indicate? The market evaluation mechanism is flawed. Projects with real accumulation, community, and technological depth are being overlooked, while those relying on marketing, packaging, and short-term hype are thriving.

User value, ecosystem foundation, team capability—when will these hard metrics become the priority for exchanges? It’s time to change this situation.

$BTC $ETH $BNB

BTC1,06%

ETH0,81%

BNB0,92%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SatoshiChallenger

· 2025-12-19 03:26

Data shows that projects with a genuine community foundation are actually being overlooked, which is a typical manifestation of market irrationality. The exchange's review mechanism should have been overhauled long ago. Interestingly, five years of accumulation are less effective than a two-person conceptual packaging; this logic itself reveals how big the problem is. Ironically, the big players have actually seen through this long ago; it's just that the market keeps repeating the same mistakes. Don't be blinded by short-term hype; true users are the moat, everything else... is just a paper tiger. If this phenomenon continues, the next round of reshuffling will be imminent. Do you want to gamble or not?

View OriginalReply0

OnChain_Detective

· 2025-12-17 17:17

ngl, this exchange listing game feels like pure theater at this point. pattern analysis suggests the whole vetting process is completely compromised... suspicious activity detected everywhere tbh. real builders getting ghosted while exit-scam-adjacent projects moon? red flags everywhere fr fr

Reply0

MEVvictim

· 2025-12-17 03:00

Really, there's no one in this market who makes sense now. Two empty shells can reach the top, while those who have been working hard for 5 years are instead sidelined. This logic is utterly absurd.

View OriginalReply0

SchroedingerAirdrop

· 2025-12-16 04:39

Five years of accumulation really can't compare to two weeks of marketing. Who wrote this script?

View OriginalReply0

FromMinerToFarmer

· 2025-12-16 04:38

That's right, but exchanges don't care about that; as long as they can spend money on marketing, that's all that matters.

View OriginalReply0

EntryPositionAnalyst

· 2025-12-16 04:33

Relying on marketing and packaging to get into top exchanges, while no one wants real ecosystems, this market logic is truly absurd.

View OriginalReply0

ForkMonger

· 2025-12-16 04:33

nah, this is just governance theater tbh. exchanges running on pure margin metrics, not protocol economics. real talk—those 10M user projects? they're friction vectors nobody wants to optimize for. the actual vulnerability here isn't market selection, it's that exchanges ARE the market now. that's the systemic attack surface nobody's discussing. fork when?

Reply0