In November 2022, the world's second-largest crypto exchange, FTX, plummeted from its peak to the bottom within just a few days. This was not a black swan event but a trust collapse carefully disguised behind a facade.
Once, FTX was regarded as the most "stable" platform in the market. Founder SBF was called the "Warren Buffett of the crypto world," with a dual persona of Wall Street elite and regulatory friendliness. The company was valued at $33 billion, backed by top investors like Sequoia, SoftBank, and Temasek. Sponsoring NBA arenas, gaining political endorsements, and mainstream media backing—all seemed so glamorous. The market consensus was clear: FTX represented the most compliant and safest choice in the crypto space.
The turning point came from a media report. Alameda's balance sheet was exposed, revealing that a large portion of its assets were composed of FTT tokens. Its liquidity heavily depended on this "own air coin." Once the news spread, users began to withdraw en masse. The exchange's cash flow instantly broke, leading to a bank run.
Even more deadly truths followed: customer assets were directly misappropriated. Where did this money go? To top up Alameda's reserves, to speculate, to prolong life. No segregation, no risk control, no bottom line. Within days, FTT became worthless, FTX declared bankruptcy, and trust in the entire industry collapsed.
How devastating were the consequences? Over $8 billion in user funds were missing, and assets of millions of people were frozen. Countless projects, funds, and retail investors were dragged down in a chain reaction. The crypto market entered its darkest hour. SBF went from a "genius youth" to a prisoner, facing multiple charges of financial fraud and money laundering.
The FTX incident left five profound ironclad rules. First, an exchange is not a bank; depositing coins is essentially an unsecured loan. Second, backing by top VCs and political endorsements does not equate to real risk control and transparency. Third, platform tokens are the biggest risk exposure—issuing tokens, setting prices, and collateralizing oneself—once out of control, it’s a nuclear bomb. Fourth, the "regulatory-friendly" persona may be the biggest disguise. Fifth, true security has never been in the promises of centralized platforms but in your own hands.
LUNA collapsed due to flaws in mechanism design; FTX collapsed due to human nature. This is not a technical issue but an inevitable result of power, greed, and lack of oversight. Two years later, these lessons still remain vital for every participant to remember.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
0xLuckbox
· 2025-12-19 19:06
Not understanding that non-custodial exchanges are the way now is a bit late... $8 billion, truly incredible.
SBF's "compliance persona" now sounds ironic in hindsight, yet he still managed to steal withdrawals.
Platform tokens are priced and collateralized by themselves; this approach should have been warned against from the start.
Sequoia and SoftBank backing does not equal safety; this time the tuition was paid quite dearly.
Those still daring to hold large assets on centralized exchanges are gamblers.
The last sentence is brilliant—LUNA was a system bug, FTX was pure scum.
Hold your self-custody wallets, everyone; don't expect anyone to guard them for you.
View OriginalReply0
RamenDeFiSurvivor
· 2025-12-19 06:05
Seeing this article, I thought of a question—what have we really learned?
How many people did SBF's "regulation-friendly persona" scam? Truly. Giants like Sequoia and SoftBank also fell for it, what does that mean? It means no one really cares about your funds; everyone is just betting on probabilities.
NBA stadium sponsorships, political endorsements... these are the best sedatives, making people think risks don't exist. And what happened? $8 billion just disappeared. How many people are still sleeping on their coins in exchanges?
The most heartbreaking point is number five—security is in your own hands. I’ve already moved the main funds to a cold wallet. It’s not that I don’t trust others; I just don’t want to be a leek again. The lessons from the past two years in the crypto world have been harsh enough.
Self-management, self-responsibility. There are no shortcuts besides that.
View OriginalReply0
FancyResearchLab
· 2025-12-17 18:07
Another "theoretically feasible" centralized exchange, in reality, is just a carefully disguised big trap. I'll try this smart contract first... Oh, I've locked myself inside again.
---
Regulatory friendliness = the biggest disguise, now I get it. Backed by Sequoia and SoftBank, but it can't stop human nature, this nuclear bomb.
---
Platform tokens issuing, buying the dip, and exploding themselves—just another useless innovation.
---
The $8 billion lesson is to make us understand what "not a bank" really means. Luban No.7 is under construction again.
---
A truly secure method is simple: don't trust any centralized promises. Exchanges that prioritize academic value MAX and practical value MIN should reflect on themselves.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyLemur
· 2025-12-16 19:50
Sequoia and SoftBank were both scammed, luckily I never trusted these people
SBF is just a scammer in a suit, perfectly illustrating what "advanced leek cutting" means
I've said many times that exchanges don't hold coins, yet some people still throw money in, it's really outrageous
Platform tokens = time bombs, how are there still people holding FTT until the last moment
Money really must be in your own hands, or you'll never sleep peacefully in this life
Two years and still repeating the same story, this circle really can't learn
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitch
· 2025-12-16 19:48
Oh my, SBF this scammer, truly unbelievable
Something's off, Sequoia and SoftBank were both duped?
So you still have to manage your own money
Talking about regulatory friendliness, it's all a facade
FTT is just a Ponzi scheme fuse
Looks glamorous, but behind it all is misappropriation
Two years later, are people still not learning?
Self-custody or get out of the crypto circle, no middle ground
In November 2022, the world's second-largest crypto exchange, FTX, plummeted from its peak to the bottom within just a few days. This was not a black swan event but a trust collapse carefully disguised behind a facade.
Once, FTX was regarded as the most "stable" platform in the market. Founder SBF was called the "Warren Buffett of the crypto world," with a dual persona of Wall Street elite and regulatory friendliness. The company was valued at $33 billion, backed by top investors like Sequoia, SoftBank, and Temasek. Sponsoring NBA arenas, gaining political endorsements, and mainstream media backing—all seemed so glamorous. The market consensus was clear: FTX represented the most compliant and safest choice in the crypto space.
The turning point came from a media report. Alameda's balance sheet was exposed, revealing that a large portion of its assets were composed of FTT tokens. Its liquidity heavily depended on this "own air coin." Once the news spread, users began to withdraw en masse. The exchange's cash flow instantly broke, leading to a bank run.
Even more deadly truths followed: customer assets were directly misappropriated. Where did this money go? To top up Alameda's reserves, to speculate, to prolong life. No segregation, no risk control, no bottom line. Within days, FTT became worthless, FTX declared bankruptcy, and trust in the entire industry collapsed.
How devastating were the consequences? Over $8 billion in user funds were missing, and assets of millions of people were frozen. Countless projects, funds, and retail investors were dragged down in a chain reaction. The crypto market entered its darkest hour. SBF went from a "genius youth" to a prisoner, facing multiple charges of financial fraud and money laundering.
The FTX incident left five profound ironclad rules. First, an exchange is not a bank; depositing coins is essentially an unsecured loan. Second, backing by top VCs and political endorsements does not equate to real risk control and transparency. Third, platform tokens are the biggest risk exposure—issuing tokens, setting prices, and collateralizing oneself—once out of control, it’s a nuclear bomb. Fourth, the "regulatory-friendly" persona may be the biggest disguise. Fifth, true security has never been in the promises of centralized platforms but in your own hands.
LUNA collapsed due to flaws in mechanism design; FTX collapsed due to human nature. This is not a technical issue but an inevitable result of power, greed, and lack of oversight. Two years later, these lessons still remain vital for every participant to remember.