The project team unilaterally changes the investment terms without providing any compensation to investors—this situation has become commonplace in the Web3 industry and is truly perplexing. It is reported that this financing deal was facilitated by a major trading platform and related partners, yet investors still cannot get a refund.

Here is a deeper issue worth pondering: when project teams can arbitrarily modify trading conditions without consequences, investor protection mechanisms are rendered useless. Should trading platforms and financing intermediaries bear more responsibility? What kind of mechanisms does the industry need to truly protect investors' rights and interests? This is not just a problem for a single project but a systemic issue that the entire Web3 financing ecosystem urgently needs to address.