2025-12-17 02:51:10

#大户持仓变化 prediction accuracy is truly incredible—95.4% hit rate, which is top-tier in the entire history of crypto market analysis.

Compared to traditional financial institutions' forecasts, very few can consistently maintain this level of precision. This data is valuable whether you're tracking the movements of $BTC, $ETH, or $SOL.

Whale activities have always been a market indicator. The higher the accuracy, the greater the decision-making reference value.

BTC-1,36%

ETH0,83%

SOL0,63%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
11
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RugPullAlarm

· 2025-12-20 01:48

95.4%? Come on, I just want to ask how large the sample size is, how long the backtesting period is, and whether the best-looking data segments were selected.

View OriginalReply0

MEVictim

· 2025-12-20 01:47

95.4%? Why do I feel it's a bit suspicious? How is this data calculated?

View OriginalReply0

BankruptcyArtist

· 2025-12-20 01:38

95.4%? Bro, this data is too crazy. Is it real or fake? --- The movements of the big whales are definitely worth paying attention to. The era of following big players to eat is here. --- Wait, can this accuracy rate really be maintained until next year? Feels a bit uncertain. --- Traditional finance folks must be crying when they see this. Meanwhile, our crypto circle is becoming more and more professional. --- $BTC $ETH $SOL these three tracked together—awesome, always able to catch the bottom. --- Just looking at the data is exciting enough, but the key is knowing how to use it. Otherwise, even the most accurate predictions are useless. --- If this really is a 95.4% hit rate, I would have been financially free ages ago. --- What are the big whales doing? When will we see real-time large order flows?

View OriginalReply0

CryptoSurvivor

· 2025-12-17 03:21

95.4%? Why do I feel this data is too outrageous? Is it real or fake?

View OriginalReply0

AllTalkLongTrader

· 2025-12-17 03:17

95.4%？Wait, where is this data from, and what is the sample size? --- I'm paying attention to the movements of the whales, but I can't quite buy this accuracy rate. It's too perfect, which makes it seem suspicious. --- Stability is the key; looking good on a single data point is meaningless. --- Tracking big players is indeed exciting, but I'm worried about survivor bias. --- Awesome! If it were really this accurate, I would have made a fortune already. I'm still hesitating here. --- $BTC has been doing a few reverse operations against the whales recently. The data looks good, but real-world trading is another story.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketMonk

· 2025-12-17 03:13

95.4%? Haha, this number itself is the biggest risk signal.

View OriginalReply0

WagmiOrRekt

· 2025-12-17 03:05

95.4%? That sounds pretty unbelievable. Is it really that accurate?

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunter_9000

· 2025-12-17 03:05

95.4% How is this number so crazy? It's a bit outrageous.

View OriginalReply0

PrivacyMaximalist

· 2025-12-17 03:04

95.4%? Feels a bit suspicious. Who verified this data?

View OriginalReply0

SoliditySurvivor

· 2025-12-17 02:58

95.4%? How is it so stable? It feels a bit surreal... You need to compare it with risk signals to tell the real from the fake. The movements of big players are indeed worth monitoring, but I'm worried the data itself might have been optimized. This accuracy rate is okay for testing $BTC volatility, but can it really predict monsters like $SOL's swings? It seems even more accurate than traditional institutions' forecasts. We'll have to see how it performs later. 95.4% sounds impressive, but I wonder how large the sample size is. I usually just watch the whale operations; I don't dare to follow the trend too closely.

View OriginalReply0