There's an interesting contrast emerging in how different teams approach AI infrastructure. One model treats AI like a proper software stack—layering in OS foundations, upgrade protocols, governance frameworks, and a structured token launch. It's a systems-thinking approach.
Meanwhile, most AI projects follow a simpler playbook: ship the model, hope for adoption, and never really establish clear ownership structures or upgrade mechanisms. No governance layer, no long-term sustainability model built in.
The difference between building a platform versus just releasing a product is starting to matter more. Which approach do you think actually scales better?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTFreezer
· 2025-12-18 15:36
Platform thinking indeed crushes one-time deals... but to be honest, most projects simply don't have the patience to build a solid foundation.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-1a2ed0b9
· 2025-12-18 09:13
ngl It still seems like someone really needs to seriously build the infrastructure, otherwise it's all just castles in the air.
View OriginalReply0
ShortingEnthusiast
· 2025-12-17 11:53
NGL, most AI projects are really just gambling on luck, but can the systematic approach truly hold up?
---
Platform thinking vs quick deployment, this debate has already been discussed in Web3, right?
---
Talking about governance frameworks is easy, but actually implementing them is all talk...
---
I think whoever runs faster wins. No matter how good the infrastructure is, you have to survive first.
---
It's hard to say whether a prolonged war or a quick rush is more suitable for this market.
---
It seems that projects with a governance layer are actually getting stuck, and transparency often leads to a lot of bickering.
---
This kind of discussion always makes me think of Ethereum's iterations back in the day... Maybe slow and steady is the real way?
View OriginalReply0
SleepyArbCat
· 2025-12-17 11:51
Platform and products... Ah, forget it, I can't think about this during the day. I'll review the gas fees again at night—that's the real scalable stuff.
View OriginalReply0
BoredWatcher
· 2025-12-17 11:50
Platform thinking indeed surpasses pure product thinking, but the reality is that most people are still betting on short-term luck.
There's an interesting contrast emerging in how different teams approach AI infrastructure. One model treats AI like a proper software stack—layering in OS foundations, upgrade protocols, governance frameworks, and a structured token launch. It's a systems-thinking approach.
Meanwhile, most AI projects follow a simpler playbook: ship the model, hope for adoption, and never really establish clear ownership structures or upgrade mechanisms. No governance layer, no long-term sustainability model built in.
The difference between building a platform versus just releasing a product is starting to matter more. Which approach do you think actually scales better?