The most incredible thing about gold is that it has achieved an outrageous statistic—70% of holders are making a profit. In other words, as long as you don't make reckless moves, buying gold is basically a guaranteed win.
Just look at the weekly chart of gold, and you'll see a steady upward channel. It's hard to imagine when it will suddenly plunge. No matter how the market twists and turns, gold remains steady there.
Now, look at $BTC? It's basically a roller coaster. When it rises, it's fierce; when it falls, it's no less aggressive. The volatility is outrageous, and it's actually less stable than some US stock ETFs.
So, thinking of using Bitcoin or other crypto assets to replace gold—honestly, that's just inviting trouble. The fundamental nature of the two is not even the same.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SlowLearnerWang
· 2025-12-20 00:13
Oh man, I only figured this out last year... The 70% win rate in gold is indeed outrageous, but compared to BTC, I just can't grasp that volatility at all.
View OriginalReply0
TerraNeverForget
· 2025-12-19 04:37
The data showing that 70% of gold holders are sitting comfortably is truly outrageous. The rollercoaster ride of BTC is definitely in a different league.
View OriginalReply0
RugpullSurvivor
· 2025-12-17 16:15
I believe in the golden passive income, but who can withstand the fluctuations of BTC?
View OriginalReply0
CommunityJanitor
· 2025-12-17 16:14
Golden's guaranteed winning attribute is indeed absolute, but the crypto world relies on volatility to survive. Don't compare two ecosystems side by side.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMisery
· 2025-12-17 16:08
The data showing that 70% of gold holders are just sitting on gains is truly remarkable. BT C is just a gambler's game.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-cff9c776
· 2025-12-17 15:56
70% of gold holders are making money. This data, frankly, represents the "aesthetic bottom line" of traditional finance. And BTC? That's a Schrödinger's bull market—making money and losing money at the same time, existing simultaneously. Looking at the supply and demand curve, the two are fundamentally different asset classes. Comparing them is like pitting Da Vinci against NFT artists to see who’s more valuable—destined to be inconclusive.
I've long seen through BTC's rollercoaster nature, but the stability of gold's "sit back and win" approach is honestly a bit boringly perfect. The financial market's drama is always like this—either choose to get rich quickly or choose retirement planning. There’s no third way.
Gold is the faith of our grandparents' generation; Bitcoin is our generation’s gamble. From a different perspective, maybe there's no need to pick sides? Play your own game, earn your own profits—that’s the true essence of Web3 decentralization [dog head].
Haha, trying to replace gold with crypto? That’s as absurd as suggesting TikTok should replace cinemas. The fundamentals are different, brother.
Actually, the coolest thing about gold is—it allows you to not think about anything. BTC, on the other hand, keeps you on edge 24/7. That difference says it all.
#数字资产市场洞察 $BTC Can it replace gold? Let me tell you
The most incredible thing about gold is that it has achieved an outrageous statistic—70% of holders are making a profit. In other words, as long as you don't make reckless moves, buying gold is basically a guaranteed win.
Just look at the weekly chart of gold, and you'll see a steady upward channel. It's hard to imagine when it will suddenly plunge. No matter how the market twists and turns, gold remains steady there.
Now, look at $BTC? It's basically a roller coaster. When it rises, it's fierce; when it falls, it's no less aggressive. The volatility is outrageous, and it's actually less stable than some US stock ETFs.
So, thinking of using Bitcoin or other crypto assets to replace gold—honestly, that's just inviting trouble. The fundamental nature of the two is not even the same.