2025-12-17 16:31:42

A certain RWA platform is actively seeking recognition from U.S. regulatory authorities and aims to establish an online trading system. Users can purchase digital tokens representing physical assets—ranging from shares in publicly listed companies, agricultural assets, to oil and gas projects. This move marks a new attempt at digitizing traditional assets. However, some economists within the Federal Reserve also hold reservations about this. This reflects a reality: although the RWA market has broad prospects, regulators still have concerns about its risk management and market stability. For the entire ecosystem to truly mature, a better balance between innovation and regulation needs to be found.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

rekt_but_resilient

· 12h ago

Once again, it's the story of RWA. The folks at the Federal Reserve are really still tangled up in risk management... Basically, they're just afraid of losing control. --- How to balance regulation and innovation? I think it’s impossible to ever strike a perfect balance—one side wants the cake, and the other wants insurance. --- Tokenizing real assets sounds great, but how many can actually be implemented without issues... Let’s wait and see. --- Another round of "promising prospects" stories. They sound nice, but in the end, it’s still stuck at regulation. --- Oil and gas projects can also be tokenized now. These days, almost everything can be tokenized—so cyberpunk haha. --- It’s normal for Federal Reserve economists to have objections; they themselves are not keen on this logic. --- RWA is hot, but the key is the regulatory attitude in the US. Without official endorsement, everything is pointless. --- From equity to agricultural assets to oil and gas... the scope is so broad that it’s hard to believe the risks are not significant.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullSurvivor

· 17h ago

I see, RWA again and dealing with US regulations... Feels like the same old story. If regulators don't approve, project teams just have to find ways to bypass, it's nothing new. Federal Reserve economists have opinions? I knew it, they always have opinions on everything. Tokenizing real assets sounds great, but when it comes to risk management... I don't buy it.

View OriginalReply0

PessimisticOracle

· 12-17 16:57

Here comes the RWA story again. The folks at the Federal Reserve are still tangled up in risk concerns. We should have gotten used to it long ago. --- It's true that regulation keeps dragging on, while innovation has already taken off. --- On-chain oil and gas projects? I think... we might need to wait a bit longer. --- It's not surprising that there are people inside the Federal Reserve who oppose it. The question is, can they stop it? --- The prospects for RWA are good, but I'm worried it might just lead to another regulatory deadlock. --- By the way, is this platform usable now? I'm a bit interested but also hesitant to try. --- The balance between innovation and regulation? Uh, uh, uh, probably can't find it.

View OriginalReply0

ChainWallflower

· 12-17 16:47

Regulation really has hit a dead end, and even within the Federal Reserve, there are fights... indicating that the real implementation of RWA is much more difficult than imagined.

View OriginalReply0

Ramen_Until_Rich

· 12-17 16:46

Both RWA and digitalization sound great, but why is the Federal Reserve so cautious? --- In simple terms, traditional finance wants to go on-chain, but the regulatory hurdles are very strict. --- Oil and gas projects can be tokenized. If this really takes off, I need to do some serious research. --- The outlook is fine, but the question is whether these people can handle risk control. I have some doubts. --- Another one shouting about innovation and regulatory balance, but in reality... it still depends on who makes concessions. --- Wait a minute, is this platform really reliable? Don't tell me it will end up a mess again. --- I've always believed that RWA is the most promising track in the crypto world, just see if the US can keep up. --- Asset on-chain will eventually become a reality, it's just a matter of time. --- It's normal for regulators to have reservations; after all, dealing with money requires caution. --- Honestly, this kind of thing can't really take off without three to five years.

View OriginalReply0

ProxyCollector

· 12-17 16:44

I am optimistic about the RWA direction, but the Fed folks are still too conservative. --- It's both regulation and risk; why are they still afraid to loosen up? --- Asset tokenization will become popular sooner or later; there's no point in fighting it now. --- The real test is still ahead—how to balance innovation and regulation is the key. --- The fact that oil and gas projects can be tokenized shows great potential for imagination. --- There are dissenting voices within the Federal Reserve, indicating that RWA has not yet reached a consensus stage. --- It still feels like a matter of time; in a few years, looking back at this news will seem outdated. --- From equity to agricultural assets, the completeness is quite high; it all depends on whether it can survive the regulatory hurdle. --- Isn't this just a replication of traditional finance on Web3? Human nature at work. --- Regulators are scared; it's obvious they can't see through the potential of RWA.

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroHero

· 12-17 16:43

It looks like RWA is really about to go live, just not sure how the Fed folks will block it. Regulation and innovation are always at odds; when will we find that balance point? The hype around RWA prospects is so strong, but how much of it will actually materialize? Tokenization of oil and gas projects and similar assets also seems risky. I've said it before, bringing traditional assets onto the chain is inevitable, just a matter of time. It's not surprising that there are dissenting voices within the Federal Reserve; these people are always defensive about new things. Equity, agriculture, oil, and gas are all being tokenized—are they trying to move the entire financial market onto the blockchain? If this really happens, I guess a bunch of follow-up platforms will pop up.

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#2025GateYearEndSummary
17.84K Popularity
#JoinGrowthPointsDrawToWinGoldenBar
26.24K Popularity
#GateLaunchpadKDK
19.86K Popularity
#FedRateCutPrediction
79.47K Popularity
#ETHTrendWatch
192.92K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
BitpizzaBitpizza
MC:$3.6KHolders:2
0.13%
2
GAIAGAIA
MC:$12.71KHolders:2034
33.07%
3
GMONEYGMONEY
MC:$3.54KHolders:1
0.00%
4
gold黄金币
MC:$3.55KHolders:1
0.00%
5
BIT1973BIT1973
MC:$3.61KHolders:2
0.09%

Sitemap