I saw a case where a retail investor opened a short position of 10,000 coins at a price of 0.4 three days ago. They've held it until now, and the price is still at 0.4, but their principal has already disappeared. At the same time, a big player also lost 1 million coins. This reflects a harsh reality: market participants all know that certain coins will fall, but they can't pinpoint the exact timing. Those who are short are hesitant, afraid of being liquidated; those hoping to profit from the price difference are also afraid of a sudden crash.
This is the game rule for low-liquidity tokens. The dealer's automated matching bots are constantly adjusting the long-short ratio, with a simple goal—maximizing profits by controlling the price. As long as retail investors enter, it's basically a pre-arranged script. In this mode, what can individual investors do to compete against mechanized dealers?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
gas_fee_therapy
· 2025-12-17 17:46
Prices stay the same, the principal is gone, this is outrageous, leverage is really poison
---
Not being able to gauge the node is a fatal flaw; no matter how smart retail investors are, they can't beat the robots
---
Low liquidity coins are just traps; the market makers can play us however they want, and we have to kneel
---
Losing 1 million coins? That’s despairing. I will never touch this kind of thing again
---
Ultimately, it's still the information gap that’s too big; retail investors are always a step behind
---
Rather than fighting against the market makers, it's better to admit defeat; anyway, you can't win
---
Afraid of liquidation and also afraid of a crash, it's truly a dilemma of both advancing and retreating
View OriginalReply0
CryptoNomics
· 2025-12-17 17:41
nah this is just survivor bias wrapped in a liquidation porn narrative. if we actually ran a regression analysis on whale vs retail PnL distributions across low-liquidity pairs, the correlation matrix would tell a different story. most people conflate "i got rekt" with "the game is rigged"—classic causality fallacy.
Reply0
BearHugger
· 2025-12-17 17:37
The price stays the same, and the principal is gone. This is outrageous; the contract's slaughter knife is really ruthless.
View OriginalReply0
ContractExplorer
· 2025-12-17 17:32
The price hasn't moved, and the principal is gone. This is ridiculous haha. Low-liquidity coins are basically a buffet for the whales.
I saw a case where a retail investor opened a short position of 10,000 coins at a price of 0.4 three days ago. They've held it until now, and the price is still at 0.4, but their principal has already disappeared. At the same time, a big player also lost 1 million coins. This reflects a harsh reality: market participants all know that certain coins will fall, but they can't pinpoint the exact timing. Those who are short are hesitant, afraid of being liquidated; those hoping to profit from the price difference are also afraid of a sudden crash.
This is the game rule for low-liquidity tokens. The dealer's automated matching bots are constantly adjusting the long-short ratio, with a simple goal—maximizing profits by controlling the price. As long as retail investors enter, it's basically a pre-arranged script. In this mode, what can individual investors do to compete against mechanized dealers?