There is a new easily overlooked direction in the RWA track—Internet domain names. Many people habitually focus on traditional assets like real estate and bonds, but in fact, domain names themselves, when mapped as on-chain assets, have untapped potential.
Take Doma Protocol as an example. I initially thought it was a clone of ENS's "on-chain name service." But after a deeper understanding, I realized that the approach is completely different. ENS mainly addresses Web3 identity and addressing needs, while Doma is about digitizing and financializing real-world domain name assets.
The key difference is: ENS is designed natively on the chain, whereas Doma maps high-value off-chain assets—(domain names)—onto the chain. Domain names, as fundamental internet resources, are inherently scarce and have persistent demand. If this RWA mapping is well executed, it could have more potential than just identity services.
Details still need to be observed, but this approach indeed unlocks an overlooked RWA opportunity.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SchrodingerGas
· 2025-12-20 05:22
Hmm, from the perspective of the RWA domain name, it is indeed easy to overlook, but to be honest, the real pitfalls are the interaction costs of mapping off-chain assets and the liquidation efficiency.
View OriginalReply0
SerRugResistant
· 2025-12-18 19:20
Oh, the domain name sector has indeed been slept on. Compared to old tricks like flipping houses and bonds, this is much fresher.
This guy broke down Doma and ENS thoroughly. Different approaches, there are definitely some valuable insights.
The scarcity of domain names is right here, and the RWA mapping route might not be a bad idea.
View OriginalReply0
BugBountyHunter
· 2025-12-17 19:01
Damn, I really hadn't thought of it from the domain name perspective. But the Doma logic definitely sounds more promising than ENS.
View OriginalReply0
TokenSleuth
· 2025-12-17 18:55
Oops, the domain name part was indeed overlooked. I only thought about the ENS system before, didn't expect it could be played like this.
View OriginalReply0
0xDreamChaser
· 2025-12-17 18:33
Using domain names for RWA is indeed innovative; I hadn't thought it could be played like this before.
There is a new easily overlooked direction in the RWA track—Internet domain names. Many people habitually focus on traditional assets like real estate and bonds, but in fact, domain names themselves, when mapped as on-chain assets, have untapped potential.
Take Doma Protocol as an example. I initially thought it was a clone of ENS's "on-chain name service." But after a deeper understanding, I realized that the approach is completely different. ENS mainly addresses Web3 identity and addressing needs, while Doma is about digitizing and financializing real-world domain name assets.
The key difference is: ENS is designed natively on the chain, whereas Doma maps high-value off-chain assets—(domain names)—onto the chain. Domain names, as fundamental internet resources, are inherently scarce and have persistent demand. If this RWA mapping is well executed, it could have more potential than just identity services.
Details still need to be observed, but this approach indeed unlocks an overlooked RWA opportunity.