2025-12-17 21:20:24

The Fed constantly finds itself chasing yesterday's problems while tomorrow's challenges quietly take shape. Is the central bank destined to always fight the last crisis?

This question brings back an old economic debate from the 2010s: cyclicals vs structurals. One camp argues recessions are cyclical phenomena that proper policy can smooth out. The other—the structurals—insists unemployment stems from deeper, structural issues that rate cuts alone can't solve.

Here's a thought experiment to test the structurals' case: What if certain labor market problems aren't temporary mismatches but hardwired into how the economy actually works? Rising wage pressures in some sectors while others stagnate. Skills gaps that don't close even with stronger demand. Geographic mismatches between jobs and workers.

If they're right, then the old playbook—cut rates when unemployment spikes, tighten when it falls—becomes a treadmill. You fight the symptom, not the disease. The Fed pulls one lever, believing it's managing the cycle, while structural forces shift silently underneath.

The kicker? Both could be true simultaneously. Some unemployment is cyclical (policy-responsive), and some is structural (resistant to policy). The art of central banking becomes knowing which is which—and honestly, that's where the guessing game gets expensive.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CommunityWorker

· 2025-12-19 02:27

Let's put it this way, the Federal Reserve is just playing "Whac-A-Mole"; press down on one problem, and three more pop up. Structural issues, to put it plainly, are fundamental flaws that can't be fixed by rate cuts... it's like giving painkillers to an amputee. The key is that now it's hard to tell whether it's a cyclical or structural problem, and the Federal Reserve itself has to gamble.

View OriginalReply0

HalfBuddhaMoney

· 2025-12-18 18:20

The Federal Reserve is like an old Chinese doctor, constantly studying the patient's medical records from last time, but the root cause for new patients has already taken hold. Those cyclical folks are naive, thinking that lowering interest rates is the end of it. Little do they know, the structural problems can't be solved with medication at all. Speaking of which, the coexistence of cycles and structures is the most painful. Isn't that just betting on whether you can tell which is which? To put it plainly, the central bank is also blindly groping the elephant.

View OriginalReply0

MondayYoloFridayCry

· 2025-12-18 10:07

Basically, the Federal Reserve is whack-a-mole; press one, and another pops up. This old trick of the Federal Reserve really should be outdated. Can structural problems be solved just by cutting interest rates? It's laughable. Central banks are always fighting yesterday's battles, while tomorrow's crises are already set up... Just thinking about it makes me frustrated. Both are correct but can't be done, which feels worse than losing money. Managing the economy by guessing? The risk is even greater than my leverage liquidation.

View OriginalReply0

ApeShotFirst

· 2025-12-17 21:50

The Federal Reserve is just a fire brigade. Once they put out one fire, another one flares up. They're always playing whack-a-mole... Honestly, they still haven't gotten to the root of the problem.

View OriginalReply0

OnChainArchaeologist

· 2025-12-17 21:50

The Federal Reserve is using last year's medicine to treat this year's illness, and they haven't really figured out what will happen tomorrow. Structural problems are something the Federal Reserve can't fix no matter what; the rate cut approach has been outdated for a long time. Honestly, we're all just betting on whether the Federal Reserve can see through the fog. There's a 99% chance we're wrong lol. Central banks are always a step behind, which is why things on the blockchain will eventually overthrow traditional finance. With two types of unemployment mixed together, how chaotic must the Federal Reserve's thinking be right now.

View OriginalReply0

MemeCurator

· 2025-12-17 21:50

Basically, the Federal Reserve is just busying itself. It cuts rates while raising them, but the structural problems can't be fundamentally fixed. The Federal Reserve is always fighting a war, and the next crisis is already waiting in the corner. The old cyclical tricks no longer work; structural issues are the real roadblock. Cutting rates is useless. People's skills can't keep up, and their geographical locations are wrong. How can they cut? Half cyclical, half structural—central banks have to play two games at once, doubling the difficulty.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrybaby

· 2025-12-17 21:48

The Federal Reserve is like a general who is always fighting the last war, never seeing the new enemies encroaching from the flanks. Structural problems are not addressed by policies at all. Relying on printing money to smooth out the cycle will only make things more expensive. In plain terms, it's like putting a bandage on the symptoms; it doesn't treat the root cause.

View OriginalReply0

LightningAllInHero

· 2025-12-17 21:46

The Federal Reserve is like playing whack-a-mole—press one problem, and two more pop up... This time, it might be impossible to press them all. Honestly, they can't even tell which issues are solvable and which are deadlocks. That group is still using strategies from ten years ago, but the economy has long since changed. The wage disparity is especially outrageous—some people get raises every day, while others have stagnant wages. What’s the point of the central bank cutting interest rates... The structural trap lies right here, it’s not about having more or less money. The treadmill theory is spot on—staying in the same place, thinking you're moving forward.

View OriginalReply0

PonziDetector

· 2025-12-17 21:45

The Federal Reserve is just running on a treadmill, managing the cycle while running and self-hypnotizing itself. As a result, structural problems have all accumulated in the basement.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-74b10196

· 2025-12-17 21:41

The Federal Reserve is just a repairman, always fixing yesterday's vulnerabilities, unaware that tomorrow's engine has already exploded. The Fed's job is to leverage itself into a win, but structural problems are simply unfixable. To put it plainly, it's like running on a treadmill, constantly addressing symptoms while ignoring the root cause. Are the issues cyclical or structural? Probably both, it just depends on whether they can identify them accurately... it's incredibly difficult. This guy is always fighting ghosts from the past, only realizing after stepping into the next trap.

View OriginalReply0