2025-12-17 23:30:10

In the Web3 space, a different kind of intelligence layer is taking shape—one focused on creator contributions and institutional recognition. Rather than chasing follower counts or engagement metrics, what truly matters is the quality of participation. Those who demonstrate consistent, articulate, and substantive engagement naturally distinguish themselves from the noise. The framework for evaluating creator value in Web3 isn't built on vanity metrics. It's rooted in recognizing who brings genuine understanding to the ecosystem, who contributes meaningfully to discourse, and who consistently adds clarity to complex systems. This shift represents a more mature phase in how Web3 communities assess influence and authority.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

screenshot_gains

· 2025-12-20 23:24

That's very true, finally someone hits the point. Those who ride the trend and boost followers every day should have been eliminated long ago. --- Sounds good, but in reality, there are still a bunch of people living off hype. Can the set of quality assessment truly be implemented? --- Quality > Quantity, this concept should have been understood by Web3 long ago. Why are we only talking about it now? Haha. --- It sounds nice, but the key is who judges quality, isn't it still about connections? --- Deep participants are indeed more valuable, I agree. But most people simply don't have the patience for that. --- Finally, someone has spoken frankly. That set of vanity metrics is already tired. --- The problem is most people can't even distinguish what is a "meaningful contribution," it's all just self-indulgence. --- Is this what a mature Web3 looks like? I think it's still a long way off. --- Gaining recognition for quality is much harder to do than to say, but the direction is right. --- Here we go again, idealism. In reality, whoever has the loudest voice wins.

View OriginalReply0

OnChainArchaeologist

· 2025-12-20 10:33

Well said, finally someone has pierced through this facade. Indeed, those who chase trending topics and traffic every day are now having a hard time. --- Quality > Quantity, this principle should have been understood long ago, but unfortunately, too many people are still chasing hype. --- Deep involvement really shows, you can tell at a glance who is serious about their work and who is just riding the wave. --- This is what Web3 should look like, stop with those vanity metrics. --- That said, how many institutions truly have the ability to recognize people and matters... isn't it just about reputation? --- I agree, but this is really not very friendly to newcomers. --- Only by continuously producing quality content can one survive, that's exactly how I do it. --- Vanity metrics should have gone bankrupt long ago.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainHolmes

· 2025-12-18 15:14

To be honest, this set of logic sounds very beautiful, but in reality, it still depends on how the ecosystem defines "quality"... Isn't it still about who can bring traffic being the awesome one?

View OriginalReply0

FlyingLeek

· 2025-12-17 23:58

Basically, it's about whether you have genuine skills and knowledge. Those who only ride the hype to boost their presence should have been eliminated long ago. Quality > Quantity, and this time, we've finally hit the mark.

View OriginalReply0

SelfStaking

· 2025-12-17 23:58

Well said, finally someone hit the nail on the head. As I always say, those who do things with real effort don't need to worry about popularity; it's the accounts that ride the trending topics every day that should be worried.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsPolice

· 2025-12-17 23:50

Well said, finally someone hits the nail on the head. The obsession with follower counts should have been abandoned long ago. Quality > Quantity, this is the right path. Otherwise, the screen is filled with scam marketing accounts. Consistently producing valuable content can truly build a solid reputation, much more professional than those riding the wave of trending topics for traffic. Web3 should be like this—only a decentralized evaluation system matches the vision of decentralization.

View OriginalReply0

PhantomHunter

· 2025-12-17 23:46

Yes, yes, yes, that's exactly what I've been wanting to say. Those who only copy and ride the hype won't last long; genuinely valuable voices will naturally be seen. Quality > quantity, and this summary is quite good.

View OriginalReply0