2025-12-18 01:28:54

Been pondering something lately: what if we could unlock more value from our bitcoin holdings the way real estate investors do with property development? Real estate appreciates partly through improvements, renovations, and better utilization. Could we apply similar logic to bitcoin—developing infrastructure, enhancing utility, or creating yield mechanisms around our holdings? It's an interesting angle on how we think about long-term crypto asset appreciation versus just holding and waiting for price movements.

BTC0,29%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NotSatoshi

· 2025-12-20 23:27

Hmm, this logic is indeed interesting, but Bitcoin isn't real estate that can be casually "renovated" anyway. --- Basically, it's just about wanting to squeeze more returns, right? I get it, but it still feels too idealistic. --- Wait, isn't this the DeFi thing... lending out coins to earn interest? --- It's somewhat interesting, but risks need to be considered too. If real estate gets damaged, at worst you renovate; if your coins get hacked, they disappear instantly. --- Honestly, people in the crypto world are just restless. They can earn with what they have and still want to earn more... hilarious. --- In terms of infrastructure, it definitely needs to be developed, but the prerequisite is that someone is actually building useful things. --- HODLer: Why can't we want both? --- The question is, who defines "unlocking value"? In the end, it's still money flowing into the pockets of a few.

View OriginalReply0

ser_ngmi

· 2025-12-18 01:58

This idea is interesting, but Bitcoin isn't a house, so there's no way to renovate it haha --- Bitcoin itself is already solid enough, no need for fancy tricks --- Honestly, it still depends on ecosystem development; layer2, Lightning Network, these are the real "development" efforts --- Wait... so you're trying to increase returns through staking or lending? Might as well just set up your positions and earn passively --- That logic is nice, but crypto hasn't evolved to that level yet; infrastructure needs to catch up first --- Just one question—do true hodlers care about this? --- Sounds like you're making excuses for not holding. I still believe in long-term value storage --- Lightning Network, sidechains, aren't they doing exactly that... why are we still talking on paper

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-c802f0e8

· 2025-12-18 01:53

This idea is actually quite interesting, but in reality, BTC liquidity and composability are far inferior to real estate... --- Feels like it's still talking about staking? Crypto has had that for a long time, the problem is that yields have been fully divided up by the vampires. --- Haha... If only it could appreciate steadily like developing property, but unfortunately, the crypto world isn't that reliable. --- Infrastructure is easy to discuss, but creating revenue mechanisms around BTC... Isn't that just those CEXFi things? What about the risks? --- Bitcoin's essence still relies on consensus for appreciation, don't overthink the fancy stuff. --- Indeed, we should think about layer2 and application layers. Pure HODLing is already outdated. --- Isn't this just talking about DeFi and yield farming? It's just old wine in a new bottle. --- Good idea, but the execution difficulty... most people even struggle to keep their seed phrases safe.

View OriginalReply0

FOMOSapien

· 2025-12-18 01:51

Hmm... It sounds like developing real estate with Bitcoin, right? You're overthinking it a bit. --- Staking, lending, BTC ecosystem construction... These have been around for a while, they're not really new concepts. --- The question is, who bears the infrastructure costs? Can hodlers alone support it? --- Honestly, it's still about trying to squeeze more returns from coins, but what about the risks... never mentioned. --- Learning from real estate ideas is possible, but the liquidity in the crypto world is completely different, bro. --- I like this idea, but in terms of execution... uh, it feels like something is still missing. --- Instead of developing, it's better to wait for ETF adoption, and the value will naturally be unlocked. --- The real value-added space isn't in layer 2 and application ecosystems? Someone is already working on it.

View OriginalReply0