2025-12-18 03:16:12

The performance of this project's token has indeed exceeded expectations.

Initially, everyone aimed for a projected cap of 10M, after all, the team had thoroughly prepared in the early stages and invested heavily in developing the fastest real-time monitoring system on the entire network—taking only 19 seconds from news release to data上线. With such a momentum of success, the token surged to 5M in the short term.

But the problem is, the project team ultimately followed a completely different script. Based on the current growth trajectory, the conspiracy sector only reached 1M, and the community module even stalled at 500k. This cap is indeed too low.

Some say it's time to admit defeat; this $20,000 loss can be considered tuition, and the mascot's final dance is about to end. However, judging from market reactions, the issue isn't with execution but with the project's expectations management and route planning. There is always a huge gap between the upper limit acceptable to the community and the actual ceiling that can be reached.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TopBuyerBottomSeller

· 2025-12-19 17:39

This is outrageous. The 19-second surveillance system still can't withstand the project team's scapegoating in the end. Give up? I've already accepted it. Who wouldn't want to recover the $20,000 tuition fee?

View OriginalReply0

FUD_Vaccinated

· 2025-12-18 20:44

A 19-second surveillance system sounds awesome, but what happened? The token still plummeted as usual, which is outrageous. The problem with the team is their arrogance and extreme expectation mismanagement. $20,000 tuition is too expensive; next time, I'll make sure to check carefully before entering.

View OriginalReply0

SneakyFlashloan

· 2025-12-18 07:41

Another expectation management failure, launching in 19 seconds and still getting slapped in the face, lol.

View OriginalReply0

VibesOverCharts

· 2025-12-18 03:46

Launching that set in 19 seconds was indeed a bit of a gimmick, no wonder it ultimately failed. Expectation management is really a weak point.

View OriginalReply0

BanklessAtHeart

· 2025-12-18 03:45

19 seconds of operation can't save this either, indicating that the real problem isn't technical. --- Twenty thousand dollars in tuition, this batch of retail investors is really ruthless. --- The team's recent roadmap planning is truly disappointing, and their expectation management is a complete mess. --- Falling from 10M to 1M, that contrast is quite stark. --- There's an ocean between the community ceiling and the actual ceiling, right? --- It was about time to admit defeat; continuing to stubbornly hold on is better than cutting losses in time. --- A 19-second speed can't change the project's poor decision-making. --- Poor expectation management makes even fast technology useless.

View OriginalReply0

ETHmaxi_NoFilter

· 2025-12-18 03:41

It's the same old trick, from the 19-second surveillance system to the final flop, a typical case of superficial gloss. At first, everyone believed in 10M, now even 1M is uncertain. Cutting a 20,000-dollar loss as a lesson learned. The problem isn't how capable the team is; the key issue is that they simply don't understand what the community wants.

View OriginalReply0

gas_fee_therapy

· 2025-12-18 03:40

Oh no, it's the same old trick of a "team's awesome system" that ends up falling flat in practice. I'm tired of it.

View OriginalReply0