When some countries' financial elites firmly declare that "mainstream crypto assets can never serve as a means of payment," many people's first reaction might be—it's over, there's no hope. It sounds like a final judgment from the traditional order. But think carefully, in the history of technological progress, haven't we seen many such "prohibitions"?
What truly matters is never what the power structures say, but what the market does. When the existing systems can't solve practical issues like real-time global settlement, borderless transactions, and censorship resistance, new technologies will grow in the cracks. From being seen as a "speculative tool" to becoming "infrastructure," this evolution will continue.
The payment sector is no exception. Instead of arguing over who qualifies to be a currency, it's more meaningful to look at what is becoming the most practical and trustworthy tool for global value flow. This is exactly what stablecoins are accomplishing.
This kind of "trust" doesn't come from a country's policy document but from solving real problems. Let's start with two core advantages—
**First, it is a truly permissionless settlement network.** No matter how regulations change across countries, stablecoins can transfer value across borders and complete transactions in seconds on the blockchain. Traditional cross-border payments are slow, expensive, and complex—this is a global pain point. Stablecoins bypass these issues directly through technology.
**Second, their prices are sufficiently stable.** Imagine using Bitcoin or Ethereum for daily payments—something that costs 100 yuan today might only be worth 80 yuan tomorrow. That’s a fatal flaw for a payment tool. Stablecoins lock their prices through over-collateralization, which is why they are more suitable for practical applications than mainstream crypto assets.
Real-world demand is often more powerful than declarations. As more cross-border trade, remittances, and small-value payments start settling on-chain, those "never allowed" declarations will seem somewhat hollow. Technological advancement doesn't require anyone's permission—it depends on genuine market demand and continuously optimized use cases.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WagmiAnon
· 2025-12-19 23:00
That's right, bans have never been able to stop genuine demand. The current situation of stablecoins is like the internet back in the day—more restrictions, more popularity.
View OriginalReply0
ContractExplorer
· 2025-12-18 03:50
Bans have been heard of many times in history, but in the end, they are still slapped in the face by the market.
View OriginalReply0
SatsStacking
· 2025-12-18 03:50
Ban? Haha, history's favorite way to slap back those absolute statements.
Stablecoins are quietly doing this, no matter how you ban them.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainWorker
· 2025-12-18 03:49
That's right, we've seen bans like this before. The key is whether the market can absorb the shock.
This round of stablecoins really hits the pain point; the cross-border payment system is truly slow and expensive.
We've heard many rumors about policy winds, but user foot voting can't be stopped.
View OriginalReply0
NoStopLossNut
· 2025-12-18 03:45
Bans have never been able to stop genuine demand; history has already proven that.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaWhisperer
· 2025-12-18 03:43
Well said, bans have never really stopped any technology. Market demand is right here, and stablecoins are indeed very appealing to use.
When some countries' financial elites firmly declare that "mainstream crypto assets can never serve as a means of payment," many people's first reaction might be—it's over, there's no hope. It sounds like a final judgment from the traditional order. But think carefully, in the history of technological progress, haven't we seen many such "prohibitions"?
What truly matters is never what the power structures say, but what the market does. When the existing systems can't solve practical issues like real-time global settlement, borderless transactions, and censorship resistance, new technologies will grow in the cracks. From being seen as a "speculative tool" to becoming "infrastructure," this evolution will continue.
The payment sector is no exception. Instead of arguing over who qualifies to be a currency, it's more meaningful to look at what is becoming the most practical and trustworthy tool for global value flow. This is exactly what stablecoins are accomplishing.
This kind of "trust" doesn't come from a country's policy document but from solving real problems. Let's start with two core advantages—
**First, it is a truly permissionless settlement network.** No matter how regulations change across countries, stablecoins can transfer value across borders and complete transactions in seconds on the blockchain. Traditional cross-border payments are slow, expensive, and complex—this is a global pain point. Stablecoins bypass these issues directly through technology.
**Second, their prices are sufficiently stable.** Imagine using Bitcoin or Ethereum for daily payments—something that costs 100 yuan today might only be worth 80 yuan tomorrow. That’s a fatal flaw for a payment tool. Stablecoins lock their prices through over-collateralization, which is why they are more suitable for practical applications than mainstream crypto assets.
Real-world demand is often more powerful than declarations. As more cross-border trade, remittances, and small-value payments start settling on-chain, those "never allowed" declarations will seem somewhat hollow. Technological advancement doesn't require anyone's permission—it depends on genuine market demand and continuously optimized use cases.
Stablecoins happen to meet these conditions.