GateToken community remains cautiously optimistic— the combination of deflationary mechanics and utility has attracted attention, but can GT surpass competitors among exchange tokens? Here are the main trends: Integrating GT into Layer 2 is exciting—burning 60% of tokens and staking mechanisms support Web3 development. Resilience in a declining market—GT’s growth is seen as a positive factor, as tokens from centralized exchanges serve as liquidity anchors. Apathy towards airdrops—small-scale airdrops trigger mixed reactions, and macroeconomic uncertainty has intensified this sentiment. Details 1. @n0day0ff: Optimism about GT integration in Gate Layer “GT is becoming a fuel token… over 60% has been burned. Staking GT now supports network operation” – @n0day0ff (38.7K followers · 3.1M views · September 25, 2025, 07:50 UTC) Original Post What does this mean: a positive signal for GT, as Gate Layer (EVM Layer 2 processes 5,000 transactions per second), linking GT with fuel fees and staking rewards, accelerating deflation since 2019—59.54% of tokens have been burned(. However, success depends on the adoption of decentralized applications—total tokens burned by GateChain reach $3.9 billion)AMBCrypto(, but to sustain growth, activity within the ecosystem still needs to increase. 2. @Nicat_eth: Resilience of exchange tokens—Neutral “GT shows rare resilience in a declining market… rising 1.78% amid an overall industry downturn” – @Nicat_eth )7.5K followers · 335K views · December 2, 2025, 08:08 UTC( Original Post What does this mean: Neutral—GT’s market cap is ) million USD, supported by fee discounts and buyback mechanisms, but trading volume remains low—$6.92 million in the past week, down 28%$791 . Competition is fierce—BNB’s market cap reaches ( billion, ETH accounts for 11.83% of the global market), putting pressure on the market for centralized exchange tokens, including GT. 3. @VenturesCapp: Small-scale airdrops trigger pessimism “Stage 112 airdrop offers 0.6 to 2.8 GT per user” – @VenturesCapp $44 70.3K followers · 415K views · November 20, 2025, 08:52 UTC( Original Post What does this mean: Negative signal—small airdrop size) per user at most(, when GT is priced at $10.20, indicating diminishing returns of growth strategies. Meanwhile, the total GT burned in Q2 reached ) million(NullTX$28 , reflecting a contradiction between token scarcity and user retention. Summary Overall outlook on GT is complex—technologically, the shift of Gate Layer toward utility is exciting), but liquidity issues$35 turnover rate 6%( and regulatory risks require caution. Watch for trading activity in December: GT needs to break through a daily) million trading volume to escape the $9.80–$10.40 range since November. Does the fate of centralized exchange tokens depend on the success of their blockchains?(
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Summary
GateToken community remains cautiously optimistic— the combination of deflationary mechanics and utility has attracted attention, but can GT surpass competitors among exchange tokens? Here are the main trends:
Integrating GT into Layer 2 is exciting—burning 60% of tokens and staking mechanisms support Web3 development.
Resilience in a declining market—GT’s growth is seen as a positive factor, as tokens from centralized exchanges serve as liquidity anchors.
Apathy towards airdrops—small-scale airdrops trigger mixed reactions, and macroeconomic uncertainty has intensified this sentiment.
Details
1. @n0day0ff: Optimism about GT integration in Gate Layer
“GT is becoming a fuel token… over 60% has been burned. Staking GT now supports network operation”
– @n0day0ff (38.7K followers · 3.1M views · September 25, 2025, 07:50 UTC)
Original Post
What does this mean: a positive signal for GT, as Gate Layer (EVM Layer 2 processes 5,000 transactions per second), linking GT with fuel fees and staking rewards, accelerating deflation since 2019—59.54% of tokens have been burned(. However, success depends on the adoption of decentralized applications—total tokens burned by GateChain reach $3.9 billion)AMBCrypto(, but to sustain growth, activity within the ecosystem still needs to increase.
2. @Nicat_eth: Resilience of exchange tokens—Neutral
“GT shows rare resilience in a declining market… rising 1.78% amid an overall industry downturn”
– @Nicat_eth )7.5K followers · 335K views · December 2, 2025, 08:08 UTC(
Original Post
What does this mean: Neutral—GT’s market cap is ) million USD, supported by fee discounts and buyback mechanisms, but trading volume remains low—$6.92 million in the past week, down 28%$791 . Competition is fierce—BNB’s market cap reaches ( billion, ETH accounts for 11.83% of the global market), putting pressure on the market for centralized exchange tokens, including GT.
3. @VenturesCapp: Small-scale airdrops trigger pessimism
“Stage 112 airdrop offers 0.6 to 2.8 GT per user”
– @VenturesCapp $44 70.3K followers · 415K views · November 20, 2025, 08:52 UTC(
Original Post
What does this mean: Negative signal—small airdrop size) per user at most(, when GT is priced at $10.20, indicating diminishing returns of growth strategies. Meanwhile, the total GT burned in Q2 reached ) million(NullTX$28 , reflecting a contradiction between token scarcity and user retention.
Summary
Overall outlook on GT is complex—technologically, the shift of Gate Layer toward utility is exciting), but liquidity issues$35 turnover rate 6%( and regulatory risks require caution. Watch for trading activity in December: GT needs to break through a daily) million trading volume to escape the $9.80–$10.40 range since November. Does the fate of centralized exchange tokens depend on the success of their blockchains?(