2025-12-18 06:22:29

Honestly, many project airdrop plans nowadays are quite frustrating. Putting in effort to participate, only to receive something less than nothing—it's not only stingy but also easily alienates people. Such designs really hurt the community. Instead of being so perfunctory, it's better not to bother with this approach from the start, to avoid awkwardness on both sides.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FarmHopper

· 2025-12-21 04:07

The airdrop is really too small, it would be better to just cut it.

View OriginalReply0

SocialFiQueen

· 2025-12-18 06:52

Airdrops are just a stupid tax; I've seen through it long ago. The tiny share you get after half a day of participation is not even worth buying vegetables. They really treat users as fools, to be honest. Instead of being so disappointing, it's better to just launch and sell directly, no need for this fake act. These project teams only know how to play this game, I've had enough.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerWallet

· 2025-12-18 06:50

Really, airdrops now are like a double-edged sword; it might be better not to do them at all. Airdrop organizers haven't really thought through what they want to achieve, which not only harms the community but also damages their own reputation. Instead of receiving tokens worth nothing, it's better not to promise anything at all. I've long seen through it—most project airdrops are just a cover-up. Participating for free, only to be exploited and feel the frustration naturally arises. Hey, sometimes I wonder if many project teams simply don't take users seriously. Designing airdrops so perfunctorily is really quite lowpass...

View OriginalReply0

WalletWhisperer