The wave of on-chain AI Agents is coming, but there's a common overlooked issue: without reliable data sources, even the smartest smart contracts are just making blind decisions.
This is why data oracle infrastructure like WINkLink is so crucial. They are responsible for securely and accurately transmitting real-world data from outside the chain to the blockchain, giving AI Agents "eyes" and "ears." In other words, data quality directly determines the decision-making quality of on-chain AI.
In the current explosion of the AI Agent ecosystem, whoever controls the trusted data entry points will seize the infrastructure dividends of this round. The value of WINkLink in this race may not have been fully realized yet.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BanklessAtHeart
· 2025-12-21 01:05
Garbage data goes in, garbage decisions come out. Everyone understands this principle, but the key is whether the oracle itself is reliable and trustworthy.
What if the oracle is attacked? Even the smartest AI Agent would be useless.
Talking about infrastructure dividends, it feels a bit late now; this wave has already been sniffed out.
WINkLink indeed lacks exposure, but the competition in the track is quite fierce, it's not just about them.
Wait, does an AI Agent really need this kind of centralized oracle? Where is the truly decentralized solution?
View OriginalReply0
LucidSleepwalker
· 2025-12-20 23:54
You're right, but I think the key still depends on whether the data itself is reliable. Oracles are just tools.
No matter how powerful smart contracts are, without real data sources, they can only guess blindly. This logic holds.
Data entry points are indeed a battleground, but how many can truly be implemented?
WINkLink has indeed solved a pain point, but with so many players in this track, it's hard to say who will really come out on top.
How long can the hype around AI Agents last? It always feels like the waves rise and fall...
The most profitable business is often infrastructure, and this rule seems to apply everywhere.
View OriginalReply0
BtcDailyResearcher
· 2025-12-18 06:53
Haphazard decision-making is an overstatement; the key still lies in the authenticity of the data sources. Currently, on-chain oracles are a mixed bag—who can we trust?
Data access = right to speak; this logic makes sense. It all depends on who can set the standards first and solidify them.
Oracles are indeed often overlooked. Everyone focuses on the Agent itself, but no one pays attention to what data is being fed in.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHustler
· 2025-12-18 06:35
That's right, garbage in, garbage out—this logic applies everywhere. Oracles are indeed easy to overlook; everyone is just focused on AI Agents hype, and no one is paying attention to data quality.
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofster
· 2025-12-18 06:33
tbh, garbage in garbage out is literally the entire game here. oracle problem isn't new but yeah... most people building onchain agents haven't thought this through, technically speaking. data integrity is the cryptographic primitive that makes or breaks the whole stack.
The wave of on-chain AI Agents is coming, but there's a common overlooked issue: without reliable data sources, even the smartest smart contracts are just making blind decisions.
This is why data oracle infrastructure like WINkLink is so crucial. They are responsible for securely and accurately transmitting real-world data from outside the chain to the blockchain, giving AI Agents "eyes" and "ears." In other words, data quality directly determines the decision-making quality of on-chain AI.
In the current explosion of the AI Agent ecosystem, whoever controls the trusted data entry points will seize the infrastructure dividends of this round. The value of WINkLink in this race may not have been fully realized yet.