Recently, industry insiders shared their thoughts on the business model of cryptocurrency exchanges. They mentioned that the current approach to operating trading platforms is undergoing a change.



In the traditional impression, exchanges are simply about matching—users place orders, and the platform earns commissions. This model is straightforward and crude, but it has a clear ceiling. However, some leading platforms are starting to change their mindset. They are referencing the operational logic of US stock brokers, where trading commissions are just one part of revenue, and data services and technology services have become the second and third largest sources of income.

The logic behind this is quite clear—users are not just here to trade; they also need market data, market analysis, API interfaces, and risk control tools. Offering these services as paid add-ons diversifies revenue streams.

In terms of capital, these platforms usually have ample reserves. Some have over 2 billion in liquid assets on their books, enough to support technological investments and business expansion. This confidence allows them to venture into more complex business modules—from basic trading to in-depth data ecosystems and institutional-level services.

What does this wave of change indicate? The infrastructure of the crypto market is upgrading. User demands are evolving, and the role of exchanges is shifting from simple matching platforms to comprehensive service providers.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
PhantomHuntervip
· 2025-12-21 06:27
The commission model should have died long ago; the real money is in data and tools.
View OriginalReply0
ExpectationFarmervip
· 2025-12-18 12:57
Basically, it's the exchange starting to compete on services. Relying solely on transaction fees is no longer feasible. But speaking of 2 billion in liquid assets, it sounds pretty intimidating. Is it real?
View OriginalReply0
MondayYoloFridayCryvip
· 2025-12-18 07:44
Huh, data services are the real deal, much more reliable than trading fees.
View OriginalReply0
RektButAlivevip
· 2025-12-18 07:42
In plain terms, the commission vouchers are no longer effective; they rely on data and APIs for revenue. But there aren't many companies holding 2 billion in liquid assets either.
View OriginalReply0
MevTearsvip
· 2025-12-18 07:15
Is this a new trick to cut leeks again? Data services, API interfaces... sounds nice, but isn't it just about wanting to charge more? --- 20 billion in liquid funds? Shouldn't that mean lowering transaction fees? Instead, they want us to pay for data. --- Exchanges have so many ideas, but users just want to trade peacefully. --- Sounds good, but the key is whether real money is flowing into reliable technology R&D. --- Is this approach borrowed from the US stock market? The wildness of the crypto market is completely different. --- In simple terms, it's shifting from single income to multiple streams of bloodsucking, and users foot the bill. --- Leading platforms have money and are starting to upgrade their business models, while small platforms are still struggling. The wealth gap is widening. --- Integrated service providers sound high-end, but whether they are reliable is hard to say.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)