Want to boost demand? Households need fatter wallets, not thinner ones. Yet here's the paradox: the system keeps saying demand is weak—everyone sees it—but refuses to pull the demand lever. Instead, it doubles down on supply-side fixes. The result? Widening the cracks it's trying to patch. You can pump more goods into the market, cut costs, optimize production all you want, but if people's pockets are empty, nothing moves. It's like pushing on a rope. The real gap between what policymakers admit and what they actually do reveals how trapped the system is. Addressing weak demand means redistributing purchasing power, which challenges too many entrenched interests. So we get band-aids on a structural wound—and the contradictions just compound.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
StrawberryIce
· 2025-12-20 19:30
That's right, that's how it is. Just shouting about weak demand is useless; at the core, it's still a lack of money. The policy level is just pretending not to see it.
View OriginalReply0
SolidityStruggler
· 2025-12-19 03:12
Basically, it's just capital's left hand and right hand touching each other. Ordinary people have no money in their pockets to talk about any demands.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHobo
· 2025-12-18 13:09
Exactly right, that's how it is... The policy level keeps shouting about weak demand every day, but all they do is focus on the supply side. Does this logic even make sense? With a shrinking wallet, what are you expecting to drive consumption?
View OriginalReply0
DuskSurfer
· 2025-12-18 07:50
At the end of the day, it's still the same old trick, claiming there's insufficient demand, but not daring to really give ordinary people a raise. The metaphor of pulling the rope is excellent, perfectly illustrating the current absurdity.
View OriginalReply0
fork_in_the_road
· 2025-12-18 07:40
The analogy of pulling the rope is brilliant. To put it simply, without money, there's no talk of needs. Policy makers understand this well; they just don't want to move those vested interests.
View OriginalReply0
RektButStillHere
· 2025-12-18 07:37
Basically, it's like drinking poison to quench thirst. No matter how aggressive supply-side reforms are, they can't save the broke retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
Degentleman
· 2025-12-18 07:36
Exactly right, the rope-pulling analogy is brilliant... What's the point of supply-side reform? People don't have money, so what goods are they even buying?
Want to boost demand? Households need fatter wallets, not thinner ones. Yet here's the paradox: the system keeps saying demand is weak—everyone sees it—but refuses to pull the demand lever. Instead, it doubles down on supply-side fixes. The result? Widening the cracks it's trying to patch. You can pump more goods into the market, cut costs, optimize production all you want, but if people's pockets are empty, nothing moves. It's like pushing on a rope. The real gap between what policymakers admit and what they actually do reveals how trapped the system is. Addressing weak demand means redistributing purchasing power, which challenges too many entrenched interests. So we get band-aids on a structural wound—and the contradictions just compound.