#数字资产市场洞察 【How Stablecoins Become Connectors Between Bitcoin and DeFi】
Bitcoin's role as a core digital asset has been established, but its liquidity and application scenarios have always been limited—mainly due to its high price volatility. To truly unlock Bitcoin's value in DeFi, a stable intermediary tool is needed.
From a technical perspective, stablecoins like USDD, which are pegged to the US dollar, are attempting to play this role. Its operational logic is relatively clear:
**Collateralization Mechanism**: Over 130% on-chain transparent asset reserves. This means that for every 1 US dollar of USDD issued, there are 1.3 dollars of assets locked behind it. This ratio may sound high, but it is mainstream practice among decentralized stablecoins—using over-collateralization to build trust.
**Price Stability**: Maintained through algorithmic design to keep a 1:1 peg with the US dollar. Theoretically, this provides users with predictable trading pairs, eliminating concerns about slippage when entering or exiting positions.
**Ecosystem Connectivity**: Direct integration with Bitcoin Layer 2 networks, allowing value to flow from the Bitcoin mainnet to application layers. This is key—avoiding the complexity and additional risks associated with cross-chain bridges.
**Yield Design**: Earn interest during holding. This makes USDD not just a payment tool but also a yield-generating asset.
From a user perspective, participants can gain platform growth sharing rights, governance participation rights, and ecosystem benefits.
**But here’s a question worth pondering**: In the current market stage, what is the most urgent role of USDD in the Bitcoin ecosystem?
One understanding is: It can bring in incremental capital. By providing an entry point for stablecoins, it makes it easier for traditional financial users or funds from other ecosystems to enter Bitcoin applications, expanding the participant base.
Another understanding is: It revitalizes existing assets. Many Bitcoin holders are actually "lying flat"—they are reluctant to sell and switch to other tokens to participate in DeFi. But if they can use stablecoins to borrow Bitcoin’s yields, it unlocks the productivity of a dormant asset pool.
Both directions are important, but which one offers a higher ROI at this stage may determine the priority of stablecoin design—whether to continue optimizing external attractiveness or to deepen internal efficiency.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MoonlightGamer
· 2025-12-20 22:47
130% collateral sounds stable, but who will cover the losses in extreme market conditions... Where is the promised transparency?
View OriginalReply0
StableGenius
· 2025-12-19 18:34
honestly the 130% collateral ratio is just security theater at this point... we've seen this movie before with dai and it didn't exactly end well when things got spicy
Reply0
GasFeeNightmare
· 2025-12-18 10:40
Honestly, 130% collateralization sounds stable, but I want to see how USDD can hold up during a bear market.
Can selling volume really achieve a 1:1 ratio? The theory is perfect, but reality always proves otherwise.
Revitalizing dormant BTC is a good idea, but the premise is that this yield is truly attractive; otherwise, it's better to just stake directly.
It seems that the Bitcoin ecosystem currently lacks a good payment layer. If USDD can really achieve that, it would be amazing.
I've heard this algorithmic stablecoin logic too many times; the Luna story is still fresh in my mind.
Bitcoin holders really are just holding passively, but letting them borrow USDD for yields? What about the risks? Has anyone really thought about it?
Incremental capital and revitalizing existing assets are not necessarily mutually exclusive; it all depends on who is willing to take over.
If USDD can stay stable this round, the DeFi ecosystem can indeed improve a lot.
View OriginalReply0
GasWaster
· 2025-12-18 10:40
A 130% collateralization will still cause problems; history has already proven that. Let's see if there are actual US dollars backing it up.
View OriginalReply0
ServantOfSatoshi
· 2025-12-18 10:39
130% collateral sounds safe, but when faced with extreme market conditions, can this line of defense hold up? A bit skeptical.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanPrince
· 2025-12-18 10:29
130% collateral sounds impressive, but actually it's just to prevent跑路.
#数字资产市场洞察 【How Stablecoins Become Connectors Between Bitcoin and DeFi】
Bitcoin's role as a core digital asset has been established, but its liquidity and application scenarios have always been limited—mainly due to its high price volatility. To truly unlock Bitcoin's value in DeFi, a stable intermediary tool is needed.
From a technical perspective, stablecoins like USDD, which are pegged to the US dollar, are attempting to play this role. Its operational logic is relatively clear:
**Collateralization Mechanism**: Over 130% on-chain transparent asset reserves. This means that for every 1 US dollar of USDD issued, there are 1.3 dollars of assets locked behind it. This ratio may sound high, but it is mainstream practice among decentralized stablecoins—using over-collateralization to build trust.
**Price Stability**: Maintained through algorithmic design to keep a 1:1 peg with the US dollar. Theoretically, this provides users with predictable trading pairs, eliminating concerns about slippage when entering or exiting positions.
**Ecosystem Connectivity**: Direct integration with Bitcoin Layer 2 networks, allowing value to flow from the Bitcoin mainnet to application layers. This is key—avoiding the complexity and additional risks associated with cross-chain bridges.
**Yield Design**: Earn interest during holding. This makes USDD not just a payment tool but also a yield-generating asset.
From a user perspective, participants can gain platform growth sharing rights, governance participation rights, and ecosystem benefits.
**But here’s a question worth pondering**: In the current market stage, what is the most urgent role of USDD in the Bitcoin ecosystem?
One understanding is: It can bring in incremental capital. By providing an entry point for stablecoins, it makes it easier for traditional financial users or funds from other ecosystems to enter Bitcoin applications, expanding the participant base.
Another understanding is: It revitalizes existing assets. Many Bitcoin holders are actually "lying flat"—they are reluctant to sell and switch to other tokens to participate in DeFi. But if they can use stablecoins to borrow Bitcoin’s yields, it unlocks the productivity of a dormant asset pool.
Both directions are important, but which one offers a higher ROI at this stage may determine the priority of stablecoin design—whether to continue optimizing external attractiveness or to deepen internal efficiency.