The tax distribution structure of this project is problematic. 95% of the taxes are taken by the development team, and ordinary participants hardly receive any benefits. This design is very unfair to the community, and the developer-centric model is indeed hard to accept.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ShibaMillionairen't
· 2025-12-21 01:50
95%? This is just a trick to cut leeks...
View OriginalReply0
MoneyBurnerSociety
· 2025-12-20 05:02
Another tokenomics with 95% sacrificed to the development team. Now I've truly seen a big scene.
Wait, isn't this my daily investment strategy? Giving all the money to others to earn.
The development team directly takes 95%? Damn, this design is even faster at losing money than I am.
I was planning to participate, but upon seeing the distribution table, I immediately turned away. Who can accept this?
But on the other hand... maybe I can reverse operate such a project and maybe make some profit?
Developers take the big share, retail investors follow and eat the crumbs. This is the current state of Web3.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterWang
· 2025-12-18 16:02
95%? That's outrageous, working for free for the developers.
View OriginalReply0
PumpDoctrine
· 2025-12-18 15:57
95%? This is outright robbery. Are the community members fools with lots of money?
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretter
· 2025-12-18 15:53
Damn, 95%? Isn't that just outright theft? Oh my God.
The tax distribution structure of this project is problematic. 95% of the taxes are taken by the development team, and ordinary participants hardly receive any benefits. This design is very unfair to the community, and the developer-centric model is indeed hard to accept.