Recently, Cluster Protocol also made it onto Wallchain's hot list, and there's quite an interesting story behind it. Wallchain's ranking mechanism isn't simply based on exposure or sentiment scores, but truly measures the community's depth of understanding and discussion enthusiasm — in other words, meaningful discussions rather than fleeting hot topics. What does it mean for a project to make it onto the list? It indicates that it is starting to attract more serious attention, with people not just watching but actually discussing it. This ranking logic, in turn, better reflects a project's actual community activity.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCrier
· 2025-12-20 10:01
Ah, this round of Cluster really has substance, not just pure hype.
Wallchain's mechanism design is quite good; finally, a platform is focusing on substantive discussions.
Speaking of, truly in-depth projects do tend to settle down easily, and I buy into this ranking logic.
But what exactly are the innovations of Cluster? Can someone explain?
This kind of genuine popularity ranking should have existed long ago to prevent being exploited by the early investors.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOrektGuy
· 2025-12-18 16:49
Wallchain's mechanism is indeed much more reliable than just looking at popularity; finally, someone is taking discussion depth seriously.
View OriginalReply0
Frontrunner
· 2025-12-18 16:45
I think this judgment is a bit too optimistic; popularity rankings ≠ project prospects. Can actual discussion volume really explain the issue?
View OriginalReply0
MoonWaterDroplets
· 2025-12-18 16:29
Hey, the fact that Cluster Protocol made the list this time is really not just hype. Wallchain's mechanism indeed values in-depth discussion, which is quite interesting.
Genuine discussion is truly valuable, not just superficial hype that floods the screen.
It seems that Cluster really has caught people's attention; otherwise, it wouldn't make it onto this list.
I quite agree with Wallchain's ranking logic. Finally, there's a platform that doesn't just look at popularity.
Recently, Cluster Protocol also made it onto Wallchain's hot list, and there's quite an interesting story behind it. Wallchain's ranking mechanism isn't simply based on exposure or sentiment scores, but truly measures the community's depth of understanding and discussion enthusiasm — in other words, meaningful discussions rather than fleeting hot topics. What does it mean for a project to make it onto the list? It indicates that it is starting to attract more serious attention, with people not just watching but actually discussing it. This ranking logic, in turn, better reflects a project's actual community activity.