2025-12-18 21:25:27

BEP-640 is here: Transaction Gas Limit Upper Bound Option

What benefits does this proposal bring to smart chain builders? Fewer network forks, lower latency, and more stable and predictable execution results.

The current problem is very real—large transactions can easily clog block execution or even trigger network reorganization. A single transaction can consume...

With the BEP-640 Gas limit mechanism, transaction execution becomes more controllable, consensus among nodes is easier to reach, and the overall network stability is improved. For developers, this means better predictability; for users, it means a smoother transaction experience.

This is an important step in the smart chain's performance optimization journey.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GmGnSleeper

· 2025-12-21 17:12

They have come up with something new again. This time, they finally figured out the gas issue; the congestion problem should have been addressed long ago.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiDoctor

· 2025-12-19 09:45

The medical record shows that the long-standing problem of large transactions clogging the network is finally being addressed. However, we need to observe the implementation details; whether the Gas cap mechanism can truly isolate risks remains to be seen. --- Another performance patch, but can it fundamentally solve the issue of node consensus failure? Regular review of node performance data is recommended. --- The stability improvement sounds promising, but the key is whether this mechanism will become a new arbitrage window... We need to see liquidity metrics after implementation to make a judgment. --- Reducing forks is indeed a hard requirement, but has BEP-640 introduced new complications? Risk warnings are in order. --- Developers' predictability has improved, but what about transaction costs? Don't just talk about smooth experience—show the numbers. --- Another optimization proposal, another effort to improve network stability... When will these iterations truly address the root causes of protocol code vulnerabilities? --- The Gas limit mechanism looks like a patchwork progressive treatment plan; how long can it be dragged out? --- Alright, for now, I am optimistic. But the clinical performance of this scheme under high concurrency transactions still needs to be tested.

View OriginalReply0

ForumLurker

· 2025-12-18 21:55

It's gas optimization again, but this time it actually looks like there's something... The congestion problem has indeed been annoying for a long time. Finally, someone thought of adding a "ceiling" to large transactions; otherwise, a huge transaction crashing the entire network is really outrageous. Developers are probably thrilled—predictability is too crucial when writing smart contracts. Just wondering, will this cap be criticized by some big players again... Let's wait and see the actual implementation. It looks good on paper, but the key is whether it can truly reduce latency.

View OriginalReply0

SigmaBrain

· 2025-12-18 21:54

Finally, someone took action. Those whale-level transactions are clogging everything and making me feel so uncomfortable. Wait, is this cap fixed or adjustable? I'm worried it might become a new cheating point. The Gas mechanism has been changed for a while, but it still feels the same. Basically, it's trading stability for delay. I just want to ask, is it worth it? Bro, please quickly interpret this. Does it really help small retail investors? Another improvement proposal. When will the price reflect these changes? Haha. It feels like every optimization is just to prepare for big players; ordinary users are still being charged high fees.

View OriginalReply0

HodlTheDoor

· 2025-12-18 21:49

It should have gone live earlier. The problem of large transactions causing congestion is really frustrating. Is BSC going to upgrade again? Let’s see if this time they can truly solve the chaos of whales dumping orders. The gas limit being stuck is making retail traders’ transaction costs go up again. This is what I want to see—the stability improves, then the developers will dare to deploy with confidence. But can BEP-640 really address the root cause, or is it just pretty surface data? I’m just waiting to see how much the transaction delays can be reduced. The previous plan was also described this way.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseLandlord

· 2025-12-18 21:39

Another new proposal here. The congestion issue is finally getting attention. It was about time to regulate those whale transactions.

View OriginalReply0

LayoffMiner

· 2025-12-18 21:36

Wow, finally going to put an end to those giant trades. They're clogging everything up and driving me crazy.

View OriginalReply0

SneakyFlashloan

· 2025-12-18 21:36

It was about time to do this. The issue of large transactions causing congestion is really annoying. Another gas mechanism optimization? Sounds good, but can it be truly implemented? If BEP-640 can stabilize the network, developers will finally have some hope. Hopefully this isn't just a paper plan again; it depends on the execution. The move on the Smart Chain was relatively timely, better than being left behind by other chains.

View OriginalReply0